What a Trump victory could mean for the defence industry
The incoming administration has said it would invest in air defence capabilities. (Photo: US Army)
Trump claimed that the US wanted “a strong and powerful military” in his victory speech.
The expected victory of Donald Trump for a second term as US president will undoubtedly have a huge impact on the national defence industry. During his campaign, Trump claimed that investments in military capabilities and production capacities would increase to overmatch China, Russia and other peer adversaries were he to beat Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris.
“We want a strong and powerful military and, ideally, we don’t have to use it,” Trump said during a speech to his supporters in West Palm Beach, Florida, on 6 November, after being named as the projected winner of the 2024 presidential election by
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Land Warfare
-
![Raytheon UK team awarded US$2.7 billion British Army training contract]()
Raytheon UK team awarded US$2.7 billion British Army training contract
The British Army’s Collective Training System 15-year contract is planned to provide soldiers with an integrated, digitally enabled system and transform how they train, prepare and adapt for future missions.
-
![What does the proliferation of larger platforms mean for the UGV market?]()
What does the proliferation of larger platforms mean for the UGV market?
A surge in heavier, combat-focused uncrewed ground vehicles is emerging, although operational demand remains uncertain.
-
![Fenris 6x6 emerges as first joint vehicle from John Cockerill-Arquus partnership]()
Fenris 6x6 emerges as first joint vehicle from John Cockerill-Arquus partnership
The new 6x6 wheeled fire support vehicle is armed with a 105mm NATO-standard high-pressure rifled gun, positioning it for the French Army and wider potential allied requirements.
-
![Do heavy IFV designs make sense on the modern battlefield?]()
Do heavy IFV designs make sense on the modern battlefield?
Even with additional armour, many current-generation infantry fighting vehicles are highly vulnerable to enemy fire in the contemporary operating environment. Are heavier platforms based on tank designs for use in this role the answer?
-
![Uncrewed ground vehicles put to the test as NATO eyes autonomous shift]()
Uncrewed ground vehicles put to the test as NATO eyes autonomous shift
The European Land Robot Trials are influenced by NATO researchers seeking to create uncrewed ground vehicle standards for allied Western forces working in multinational task forces.
