US fighter jet drops fuel tanks in Japan accident
The Japanese MoD demanded explanations on 20 February from the US military after a fighter jet experiencing an engine fire dropped two fuel tanks into a lake in the country's north.
The incident, which caused no injuries, is the latest in a string of accidents involving the US military that have prompted concern from Japanese officials and renewed criticism of the US military presence in the country.
Japan's defence minister Itsunori Onodera, said: ‘We are asking the US side to explain what happened and its cause and we fully demand the US side take prevention measures. The US military has told us that it discarded two exterior tanks on Lake Ogawara just north of Misawa Air Base and landed back at Misawa Air Base.’
Onodera added that the F-16 took off from the Misawa Air Base in northern Japan's Aomori region early on 20 February morning and immediately experienced an engine fire.
In a statement, the US military confirmed that one of its F-16s had been forced to ‘jettison two external fuel tanks into an unpopulated area’ after an engine fire broke out.
Col R. Scott Jobe, commander of the USAF 35th Fighting Wing, said: ‘The safety of our airmen and our Japanese neighbours is our number one priority during flying operations. We will conduct a thorough investigation to determine the root cause of this incident.’
The case follows a string of accidents involving US military aircraft, for which US Secretary of Defence James Mattis apologised to Onodera in January.
US military helicopters made at least three emergency landings in the southern region of Okinawa in January alone.
In December, a window from a US military helicopter fell onto a school ground in Okinawa, and in October a US military helicopter burst into flames after landing in an empty field on Okinawa.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.