Future warfighting demands departure from conventional methods
Ongoing technological developments, the influence of non-state actors and new operational strategies will require armed forces able to fight in unconventional ways, according to speakers at the latest US Army Mad Scientist webinar held on 19 January.
This will influence not only the future procurement of weapons and equipment but also the ways in which armed forces train to deal with new scenarios.
Speakers highlighted the increasing presence on the battlefield of new systems, unconventional groups and the techniques that they have been introducing.
In particular, leveraging technology has a force multiplier effect for traditionally smaller-scale militaries and unconventional armed
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: New public security needs drive personal protection equipment modernisation
European law enforcement and public security agencies are entering a new cycle of investment in personal protection equipment (PPE), driven by evolving threat profiles, officer welfare requirements and advances in materials technology.
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO’s eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Eurosatory 2026 to highlight changing defence and security priorities
Eurosatory 2026 will reflect a defence and security sector shaped by conflict, rising government spending, uncrewed systems, multidomain networks and growing demand for sovereign capabilities.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.