German Army facing 'big gaps' as spending cuts bite
Germany's armed forces are being pushed beyond their limits as Berlin makes greater international commitments while failing to invest in and reform the military, according to a report published on 20 February.
‘The army's readiness to deploy has not improved in recent years, but instead has got even worse,’ parliamentary armed forces commissioner Hans-Peter Bartels said as he presented his annual findings, pointing to ‘big gaps’ in personnel and equipment.
By the end of 2017, all Germany's submarines were in drydock for repairs, while in recent months there have been periods where none of the German Air Force's 14 A400M transport planes are airworthy.
The litany of disrepair continues through fighter planes, tanks, helicopters and ships lamed by bad planning and a lack of spare parts.
German Air force pilots are unable to train as their aircraft are grounded for maintenance for much of the year, the report noted.
Spending on defence has been cut repeatedly since 1990 and the end of the Cold War, leaving the army with often outdated equipment and the defence industry unable to suddenly increase production to fill the gaps.
Bartels said: ‘Despite government promises to find more cash, tasks for which there are supposed to be additional people and equipment in future are already upon us. Soldiers already have to accomplish them today as best they can, using whatever is to hand.’
The grave state of the German Army has persisted even as leaders in Berlin commit troops to increasing numbers of foreign deployments – ranging from their traditional role deterring Russian forces in Europe alongside NATO partners to interventions in conflict zones like Mali or Iraq.
Allies of Europe's most populous nation and largest economy, from Washington to Warsaw, complain that Germany is not doing enough to get its army fighting fit.
Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki complained recently of ‘free riders’ in NATO failing to spend enough and ‘endangering unity’ in the ranks of the alliance, in comments many saw as directed at his western neighbour.
And US President Donald Trump has reiterated years-old US complaints that Germany does not live up to its NATO commitment to spend 2% of gross domestic product on defence.
Germany presently spends just 1.2% of GDP on its military.
German media recently reported that as well as tanks, Germany's troops supposed to join a NATO ‘rapid reaction force’ lacked protective vests, winter clothing and tents.
‘We will make the best possible equipment, training and support available to our soldiers,’ German Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative CDU said in a coalition agreement sealed with the Social Democratic Party (SDP) that is still to be approved by SDP members.
But even if a prospective new Merkel government loosens the purse strings, ‘we wouldn't be in a position to spend more money with our present procurement structures,’ Bartels said.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.