Can the Trump administration overcome the Pentagon's multiple capability integration issues?
Instruction and preparation for JADC2 operations at Fort Carson Army Base. (Photo: US Air Force)
The new Trump administration will face multiple challenges in plugging integration capability gaps in the Pentagon, according to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO). Although the previous US leadership had conducted several initiatives in this domain, efforts to connect software, C4ISR and training across the services still require attention and investment, GAO noted.
Reduced levels of innovation and low speed to implement new solutions were among the main problems to overcome, with both directly related to the bureaucracy of the acquisition processes.
In its 2024 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, the GAO stressed that, in the last 10 years, major defence acquisition programmes
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
UK Chancellor commits £2 billion to make the country a “defence industrial superpower”
Rachel Reeves announced port upgrades, protected budgets for innovation and investment in novel technologies.
-
Launch of Gilat Defense targets DoD market
The communications company Gilat launched its new Gilat Defense division at the Satellite 2025 expo, with future solutions aimed at US military customers.
-
Collins MAPS Gen II to equip US DoD watercraft
US services have already conducted multiple tests with military maritime systems fitted with the system.
-
OCCAR expects substantial boost in programme numbers “in the coming months”
Europe’s Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR) “has to establish itself…as a centre of excellence for cooperative Defence Equipment Programmes” in the face of growing threats and the need for rearmament, according to the organisation’s chairman.
-
MBDA CEO emphasises “moment of truth” for Europe as company sees €37 billion backlog
MBDA CEO Éric Béranger stressed the company’s role supporting European countries with complex weapon systems and focused on boosting production against the backdrop of “shifting” geopolitical alliances.