To make this website work, we log user data. By using Shephard's online services, you agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Open menu Search

Russian tactics in Ukraine reflect need for GBAD

1st March 2022 - 11:25 GMT | by Sam Cranny-Evans in London


Russian precision strikes initially focused on defence infrastructure but population centres in Ukraine are not been immune from the effects of the invasion. (Photo: Andriy Dubchack/Donbass Frontier)

What should NATO planners take as initial lessons from the Russia-Ukraine war?

The opening phases of the Russian invasion of Ukraine demonstrated the need for layered ground-based air defences that are capable of protecting critical national defence infrastructure.

The initial attack included the widespread use of cruise and short-range ballistic missile strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure. Russian state-run media reported that Ukrainian airfields and air defences were targeted on the first day.

Russia claims to have destroyed 14 Ukrainian airfields, 19 C2 stations, 24 anti-aircraft systems including S-300s and 48 radar stations.

Most claims from Russia lack independent verification but it is clear that an extensive effort has been made, although not entirely

Already have an account? Log in

Want to keep reading this article?

Read this Article

Get access to this article with a Free Basic Account

  • Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
  • 2 free stories per week
  • Personalised news alerts
  • Daily and weekly newsletters
Create account

Unlimited Access

Access to all our premium news as a Premium News 365 Member. Corporate subscriptions available.

  • Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
  • 14-day free trial (cancel at any time)
  • Unlimited access to all published premium news
Start your free trial
Sam Cranny-Evans


Sam Cranny-Evans

Sam is a freelance defence analyst and consultant, as well as a RUSI Associate Fellow. …

Read full bio

Share to