Western air strikes in Syria illegal: German parliament experts
The air strikes unleashed in Syria by Western allies in mid-April were a violation of international law, jurists at the German parliament said in a report 20 April.
'The use of military force against a state, as a sanction against the violation of an international convention by this state, is an infringement of the prohibition of the use of violence in international law,' said the Bundestag experts in a reply to a question filed by the far-left Die Linke party.
The Bundestag experts referred in particular to the UN declaration from their 1970 general assembly which stresses 'the duty of States to refrain in their international relations from military, political, economic or any other form of coercion aimed against the political independence or territorial integrity of any State'.
The UN Security Council had also rejected armed retaliation, calling it 'incompatible with the objectives and the principles' of the United Nations.
The legal motive put forward by the UK, which joined in the air strikes alongside the US and France, was also 'not convincing' according to the Bundestag experts.
London said it was 'both right and legal' to launch strikes to alleviate humanitarian suffering.
But the experts said there were questions over 'whether the military attacks are really appropriate to prevent further suffering' in Syria.
On 14 April, the US, UK and France fired missiles meant as a response to what the trio of nations said was evidence Damascus had used chemical weapons a week earlier.
Purported footage of victims foaming at the mouth after the 7 April attack sparked an outcry and prompted the West to launch its biggest military action yet against Assad's regime.
But the military action was carried out without the approval of the UN Security Council, where Assad's ally Russia has a permanent seat and veto.
Germany did not join in the air strikes but Chancellor Angela Merkel called the military action 'necessary and appropriate'.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.