Syrian government rejects watchdog report on deadly chlorine attack
The Syrian regime on 7 March 2019 rejected a report by the world's chemical weapons watchdog confirming chlorine was used in an attack against the Syrian town of Douma in April 2018.
The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said on 1 March that there were ‘reasonable grounds' to believe toxic chemicals containing ‘reactive chlorine’ had been used in the attack, which witnesses said killed 43 people. It said two cylinders likely containing the chemical had smashed into a housing block in Douma, which was held by rebels at the time.
The team had no mandate to assign responsibility for the attack, but Western powers led by the United States blamed the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, unleashing air strikes on regime military installations in response. A spokesman for Syria's foreign ministry said Thursday the government rejected the OPCW's findings in their entirety.
The official ‘called on member states of the OPCW to denounce such false reports, which lack credibility’, accusing the OPCW of being ‘biased and unobjective’, state news agency SANA said, in the first official response to the OPCW report.
The report was based on a visit to Douma by OPCW inspectors. The team took more than 100 samples from seven sites in the town, to which the regime had denied them access for several weeks. The OPCW said it reached its conclusions based on ‘witnesses' testimonies, environmental and biomedical samples analysis results, toxicological and ballistic analyses from experts’.
Friday's report also denied the Syrian government's claims that the gas came from a rebel chemical weapons facility and storehouse in the area. ‘From the analysis of the information gathered during the on-site visits to the warehouse and facility suspected of producing chemical weapons, there was no indication of either facility being involved in their manufacture,’ it said.
The foreign ministry spokesman quoted by SANA said investigators were falsifying information. ‘This is evidenced by their denial that armed terrorist groups possess toxic chemicals even though they found such chemicals’ in warehouses owned by rebels, SANA quoted him as saying.
The OPCW has investigated multiple chemical attacks during the eight-year Syrian civil war, and has previously confirmed the use of ‘chlorine, sulphur mustard, and sarin as chemical weapons’ in other incidents. The organisation previously had no mandate to assign responsibility for attacks, but has since been given powers to investigate responsibility for all chemical attacks in Syria back to 2014.
Syria's multi-fronted war has killed more than 360,000 people since it began in 2011 with President Bashar al-Assad's regime suppressing protests.
More from Defence Notes
-
Why small guns have been critical to layered CUAS architectures
Multiple countries have been deploying small arms as the last line of drone defence due to their multiple operational and tactical advantages.
-
Singapore Airshow 2026: ST Engineering hints at export success for AME assault rifle family
The Singapore-based technology company unveiled its new rifle family at this week’s airshow. Chen Chuanren spoke with the ST Engineering’s head of small arms to find out more about how the weapons have been refined.
-
High tension in the High North – a wake-up call for NATO’s future Arctic defence efforts?
Any potential ‘Arctic Sentry’ mission would be months in the planning, but with tensions high in the region given the US’s push for Greenland, NATO countries will need to continue to emphasise their commitment to the region, analysts have said.
-
Venezuela prepares personnel and equipment for a potential second US attack
Defence Minister Gen Vladimir Padrino López has declared that the Venezuelan armed forces “will continue to employ all its available capabilities for military defence”.
-
As the new year starts, the UK defence spending delay continues
The UK’s defence spending commitments remain uncertain as the government’s Defence Investment Plan, which had been due by the end of 2025, is yet to be published.