ICAN condemns surge in nuclear arms investments
Global nuclear tensions helped boost investments in atomic weapons production by around $81 billion in 2017, campaigners said on 7 March, urging investors to blacklist the companies that stock the world's nuclear arsenals.
Beatrice Fihn, who heads the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), said: ‘If you have been wondering who benefits from [US President] Donald Trump's threat of nuclear war, this report has the answer.’
ICAN won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize.
In a report, ICAN and another anti-nuclear campaign group PAX detailed a ‘massive increase’ in investments in the top 20 companies involved in producing key components for the nuclear arsenals of Britain, France, India and the US.
The report, titled ‘Don't Bank on the Bomb’, found that a total of $525 billion was made available last year to such companies – an increase of $81 billion from 2016.
Fihn said in a statement: ‘A new nuclear arms race has moved the Doomsday Clock closer to Armageddon, but it has also started a new nuclear gold rush for those wanting to cash in on mass destruction.’
The report authors said the selection of the top 20 companies that have benefitted from the boom, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Airbus and BAE Systems, was ‘not exhaustive’.
The list, they said, was ‘an attempt to identify the privately owned companies that are most heavily involved in the nuclear weapon industrial complex.’
They also explained that suppliers to the other five nuclear weapons states – Russia, China, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea – were not included because they mainly relied on government agencies.
With the current standoff between the US and North Korea creating the world's most acute nuclear threat in decades, Fihn urged investors to divest from nuclear weapons producers.
Trump has also ratcheted up global tensions over Iran, by criticising a landmark 2015 agreement to restrict Tehran's nuclear programme.
Vowing to ‘shame’ whoever tried to profit from nuclear weapons production, Fihn said: ‘Producing, possessing and modernising nuclear weapons is not something to be proud of.’
Other companies listed in the report included Honeywell International, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Aecom, BWX Technologies, Huntington Ingalls Industries and Jacobs Engineering.
The report authors also listed the investment companies that pumped most money into nuclear weapons producers in 2017, with three – BlackRock, Vanguard and Capital Group – alone accounting for around $110 billion.
While the report criticised the ‘massive increase of investments in mass destruction’, it also hailed 63 financial institutions that are limiting or refusing to make such investments.
Among them was Norway's massive pension fund, which is valued at nearly $1 trillion.
Sue Snyder of PAX said: ‘Investments are not neutral. These companies should be congratulated for standing on the side of humanity.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.