Decline in Afghan forces less sharp than thought: SIGAR
The strength of Afghanistan's security forces has declined less sharply than previously reported, a US watchdog said, citing incorrect figures given by the US military in April 2018.
The quarterly report from the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), released in April 2018, had stated that Afghan security forces had been depleted by about 10% over the course of a year.
Based on that figure, there were estimated to be 296,409 active military, police and intelligence personnel as of 31 January 2018.
But on 15 May SIGAR said corrected figures from United States Forces-Afghanistan ‘indicate a total ANDSF (Afghan National Defence and Security Forces) strength of 313,728 as of 31 January.’
The watchdog said: ‘The new numbers still show that overall ANDSF strength declined sharply from January 2017 to January 2018 (by 17,980 personnel), though not as sharply as reported.’
The confusion was ‘the latest in a series of problems SIGAR’ has faced regarding information about Afghan forces, it said.
The updated figures come on the heels of another deadly day in Afghanistan as the Taliban launched an assault on the western city of Farah. Commandos from Herat and Kandahar were rushed to the provincial capital as US and Afghan air forces carried out airstrikes.
This helped to push the insurgents to the outskirts of Farah by early 16 May, though a clearing operation was still going on.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow]()
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
![Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme]()
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
![Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans]()
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
![UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions]()
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
![Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details]()
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.
