Canadian vice admiral in court over leak charge
The former second in command of Canada's military briefly appeared in court 10 April to face a charge that he leaked cabinet secrets related to navy shipbuilding plans.
Vice Admiral Mark Norman, 54, wearing his navy uniform and medals pinned to his blazer, did not enter a plea.
Instead, defense lawyer Marie Heinen pushed for an expedited process.
'I'm anxious to get to court, get this dealt with as quickly as possible and get back to serving the people of Canada,' Norman said following the court appearance.
Norman, who was second in command of the military prior to being relieved of duty in January 2017, faces up to five years in prison, if convicted.
He was charged last month with breach of trust - a criminal offense - for what federal police said was having 'illegally disclosed government information to unauthorized parties'.
According to court documents, Norman provided sensitive government information to a local shipyard that had been selected by the previous Tory administration to provide the navy with an interim supply ship.
In emails obtained by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Norman seemed worried that the project would be delayed over concerns raised by the shipyard's rivals about a lack of competition in awarding the contract.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberals put the project on hold when they came to power in 2015, but eventually decided to proceed with it.
The MV Asterix (pictured) was recently delivered to the navy to begin operations.
The trial is expected to start in 2019 just prior the next federal election.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow]()
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
![Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme]()
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
![Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans]()
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
![UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions]()
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
![Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details]()
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.
