Are Australia’s SSN ambitions ‘sub-optimal’? (Opinion)
In 2021, Australia declared it had set its heart on obtaining nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSN) to help meet the strategic threat posed primarily by China. As the leaders of Australia, the UK and the US assembled in San Diego on 13 March to announce the optimal pathway forward, it all appeared rather straightforward on paper.
But let there be no mistake. Australia has set itself a Herculean task, one where the instigators of AUKUS perhaps did not realise the sheer magnitude that lay before them. Furthermore, the country is locking itself into a route from which there is little chance
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
Read this Article
Get access to this article with a Free Basic Account
- Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
- 2 free stories per week
- Daily news round-up email service
- Access to all Decisive Edge email newsletters
Unlimited Access
Access to all our premium news as a Premium News 365 Member. Corporate subscriptions available.
- Original curated content, daily across air, land and naval domains
- 14-day free trial (cancel at any time)
- Unlimited access to all published premium news
More from Naval Warfare
-
USS Zumwalt undocked after supersonic weapons upgrade
The vessel will be the first in the US fleet to carry the Conventional Prompt Strike capability.
-
USS Arkansas Virginia-class submarine commissioned
The last of the Virginia-class Block IV submarines will be commissioned soon.
-
Exercise Freezing Winds brings navies together to ease Finland into NATO
The nine-day exercise off the Finnish coast was intended to boost interoperability in challenging weather conditions.
-
BAE Systems thinks littorally with new ship designs
The shape of littoral combat is evolving, but will the Littoral Strike Craft from BAE Systems meet the needs of navies?