Technology transfer: how well does it work?
Otokar's Cobra II 4x4 will soon be built in Romania under a contract signed late last year. (Photo: Otokar)
Technology transfer is trumpeted by many companies as a way to tap into new markets, win contracts and expand supply and manufacturing capability. It is often used in the area of armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) and these requirements are a way to see how – and if – they work.
The ‘grip and grin’ photo opportunity with cooperation agreements on the table is a staple at defence shows as large companies look for a way into smaller markets or countries with large requirements looking to grow their own industrial base.
While many sales of new AFVs still involve old-school off-the-shelf purchases, many countries also require the technology transfer element.
When it comes to AFVs, systems which might be ‘transferred’ include the complete suspension and drive line, engine, transmission, transfer box and key larger elements such as complete turrets and weapon systems.
Additionally, there is the ammunition for those weapons. While
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Land Warfare
-
![Why bridging the gap between military and COTS systems is key to seamless defence comms (Studio)]()
Why bridging the gap between military and COTS systems is key to seamless defence comms (Studio)
Technology that enables armed forces to leverage existing network infrastructure can be a game-changer in many combat scenarios.
-
![Rheinmetall Nordic’s Ragnarok mortar upgrade shows strong integration potential]()
Rheinmetall Nordic’s Ragnarok mortar upgrade shows strong integration potential
The Ragnarok Mortar Mission Module has demonstrated its ability to quickly switch platforms, presenting scope for it to be employed for multiple requirements.
-
![Could an outdated US Army organic industrial base threaten US readiness?]()
Could an outdated US Army organic industrial base threaten US readiness?
The US Army’s organic industrial base still uses World War II production methods and technologies, leading to delays and cost overruns and limiting its ability to produce critical ammunition and maintain its ground fleet in operation.
