Western air strikes in Syria illegal: German parliament experts
The air strikes unleashed in Syria by Western allies in mid-April were a violation of international law, jurists at the German parliament said in a report 20 April.
'The use of military force against a state, as a sanction against the violation of an international convention by this state, is an infringement of the prohibition of the use of violence in international law,' said the Bundestag experts in a reply to a question filed by the far-left Die Linke party.
The Bundestag experts referred in particular to the UN declaration from their 1970 general assembly which stresses 'the duty of States to refrain in their international relations from military, political, economic or any other form of coercion aimed against the political independence or territorial integrity of any State'.
The UN Security Council had also rejected armed retaliation, calling it 'incompatible with the objectives and the principles' of the United Nations.
The legal motive put forward by the UK, which joined in the air strikes alongside the US and France, was also 'not convincing' according to the Bundestag experts.
London said it was 'both right and legal' to launch strikes to alleviate humanitarian suffering.
But the experts said there were questions over 'whether the military attacks are really appropriate to prevent further suffering' in Syria.
On 14 April, the US, UK and France fired missiles meant as a response to what the trio of nations said was evidence Damascus had used chemical weapons a week earlier.
Purported footage of victims foaming at the mouth after the 7 April attack sparked an outcry and prompted the West to launch its biggest military action yet against Assad's regime.
But the military action was carried out without the approval of the UN Security Council, where Assad's ally Russia has a permanent seat and veto.
Germany did not join in the air strikes but Chancellor Angela Merkel called the military action 'necessary and appropriate'.
More from Defence Notes
-
US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness
The US Congress has raised concerns about how inflation rates and cuts in main acquisition programmes could affect the US military.
-
US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap
The Pentagon has been operating under temporary funding since October 2023, which has impacted its main acquisition and development programmes, increasing the capability gap between the US and China.
-
NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls
In 2023, defence spending increased by an unprecedented 11% across European NATO countries and Canada. Since 2014, the group has spent an additional US$600 billion on defence.
-
US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025
The DoD requested nearly US$850 billion to fund operations over the next fiscal year. Despite the amount being 1% higher than the FY2024 budget request, it has not covered the 3% inflation rate, which could impact the DoD’s main programmes in the medium and long term.
-
Haiti crisis forces Caribbean militaries to prepare for intervention
As gangs gain control of Port-au-Prince, Haiti’s Caribbean neighbours have been preparing to intervene in the failed state, with the US and other partners waiting in the wings with equipment and financial support.