US gives Russia 60 days to comply with nuclear treaty
The US warned Russia on 4 December it will withdraw from a major Cold War treaty limiting mid-range nuclear arms if Moscow does not dismantle missiles that Washington says breach it within 60 days.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Washington would no longer be bound by the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty unless Moscow withdraws a new system that has threatened to trigger an arms race.
NATO said it was now ‘up to Russia’ to save the deal, seen by many as an important part of the global arms control architecture, and alliance chief Jens Stoltenberg said it was time to prepare for its demise.
‘The United States today declares Russia in material breach of the treaty and we will suspend our obligations as a remedy in 60 days unless Russia returns to full and verifiable compliance,’ Pompeo said after talks with fellow NATO foreign ministers.
‘Russia’s actions gravely undermine American national security and that of our allies and partners. It makes no sense for the United States to remain in a treaty that constrains our ability to respond to Russia’s violations.’
The US and NATO say Russia’s 9M729 system, also known by the designation SSC-8, violates the INF treaty, which banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres.
The nuclear-capable Russian cruise missiles are mobile and hard to detect and can hit cities in Europe with little or no warning, according to NATO, dramatically changing the security calculus on the continent.
Stoltenberg said that although Russia has a last chance to comply, ‘we must also start to prepare for a world without the treaty’, which was the first to abolish a whole category of weapons.
‘This was really arms control at its best and therefore it’s a really a big setback if this treaty now breaks totally down,’ he said.
‘I regret that we will now most likely see the end of the INF treaty, but at the same time we don’t have any other alternative than to react in the way we do.’
In October, President Donald Trump declared the United States would pull out of the treaty and build up America’s nuclear stockpile ‘until people come to their senses’.
But on 3 December, the US leader said he wants talks with his Chinese and Russian counterparts Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin ‘to head off a major and uncontrollable Arms Race’.
The INF was a bilateral treaty between the US and the then Soviet Union, so it puts no restrictions on other major military actors like China.
Pompeo said there was no reason why the US ‘should continue to cede this crucial military advantage’ to rival powers.
If Russia does not comply within the 60-day deadline, the US will begin the six-month process of formally withdrawing from the INF treaty.
Until then, Pompeo said, the US would not ‘test or produce or deploy any systems’ that would breach the treaty.
The US won strong backing for its position from the rest of the NATO allies, who said in a joint statement that it was ‘now up to Russia to preserve the INF treaty’.
More from Defence Notes
-
“Engage with the operational problem”: how software innovation can boost UK defence
In Conversation… Shephard’s Andrew White talks to Zafer Şen, CEO and co-founder of OBSS, about the future of command-and-control software in the age of artificial intelligence, and his company’s ambitions in the UK defence market.
-
“Capital follows confidence” as defence courts private money
Outside investment and the direction in which venture money flows may reveal what defence will buy years before formal programmes begin.
-
Canada’s new military drone marketplace targets rapid acquisition pipeline
The Department of National Defence expects initial contracts to deliver thousands of uncrewed systems, but has yet to establish the quantities, capability mix or deadline behind Ottawa’s promised tenfold expansion.
-
Ukraine turns legacy Kongsberg land turrets into semi-autonomous USV weapons
The company told Shephard that Ukraine is operating modified Protector weapon stations originally supplied for armoured vehicles, with human operators authorising engagements from hundreds of kilometres away.
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.