US denies report it is leaving up to 1,000 troops in Syria
The US strongly denied a report that it intended to leave almost 1,000 troops in Syria, adding plans for a residual force of around 200 troops had not changed.
The Wall Street Journal had reported on 17 March that as talks with Turkey, US-backed Kurdish forces and European allies have failed to produce a deal on a ‘safe zone’ in north-eastern Syria, the US now intended to keep working with Kurdish fighters in the country.
It quoted US officials as saying the plan could see up to 1,000 US forces spread across the country.
‘A claim reported this evening by a major U.S. newspaper that the US military is developing plans to keep nearly 1,000 U.S. troops in Syria is factually incorrect,’ General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a statement. ‘There has been no change to the plan announced in February and we continue to implement the President's direction to draw down U.S. forces to a residual presence.’
But he added the US was continuing to ‘conduct detailed military planning with the Turkish General Staff to address Turkish security concerns along the Turkey-Syria border.’
‘Planning to date has been productive and we have an initial concept that will be refined in the coming days,’ he said. ‘We are also conducting planning with other members of the Coalition who have indicated an intent to support the transition phase of operations into Syria.’
President Donald Trump had abruptly announced in December 2018 the immediate and complete withdrawal of the 2,000 US troops deployed in north-eastern Syria, declaring victory against the Islamic State group. The decision prompted his defence secretary Jim Mattis to quit.
Then, under pressure from Congress and the Pentagon, he agreed to leave a residual force of some 200 US troops, which he wants to be reinforced by allies in the anti-IS coalition.
An objective of the international force is to guarantee the security of its Syrian Kurd allies. Turkey, a NATO member, views the Kurdish combatants as terrorists, and the Europeans fear they would be vulnerable if Ankara launched an offensive.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.