Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
The firing of a Patriot missile. (Photo: US Army)
President Donald Trump’s announcement last month that the US had selected the architecture of its Golden Dome for America air defence system brought with it multiple questions regarding the programme which was among his main campaign promises.
During a press conference, Trump claimed that the “cutting edge missile defence shield” would be equipped with next-generation capabilities and should be fully implemented by the end of his mandate.
After hearing multiple sources in the government, industry and academia, Shephard outlines seven critical considerations likely to influence the direction of the programme and where the effort could succeed or fail.
1: The US will need to
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
Is the US magazine of air defence interceptors deep enough to sustain a long campaign against Iran?
The Pentagon spent a considerable number of THAAD and SM-3 rounds to defend against Iranian missiles in 2025 and has not fully replenished its reserves.
-
New Zealand buys tri-service uncrewed kit from Syos Aerospace
As uncrewed technology continues to play an increasingly central role in modern military activities, New Zealand’s recent acquisitions point towards its the force’s focus on cost-effective capability.
-
Golden Dome for America hits one-year mark but key questions remain on its progress
Integration issues, bureaucracy and undefined policies and authorities could hamper the full implementation of the “shield” to defend the US territory against aerial threats.
-
US Air Force pushes Sentinel’s initial capability to early 2030s despite China’s nuclear progress
While the US struggles to modernise the 50-year-old land leg of its nuclear triad, China has been rapidly developing and fielding new nuclear capabilities.