Pentagon still backs Iran nuclear deal, says official
The Iranian nuclear deal is still in the best interests of the US, a senior Pentagon official said 13 March, going against President Donald Trump’s claim that it is a ‘terrible’ agreement.
US Central Command Chief General Joseph Votel told a Senate panel he shared the views of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joe Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Votel said: ‘From my perspective, the JCPOA addresses one of the principal threats that we deal with from Iran.
‘So, if the JCPOA goes away, then we will have to have another way to deal with the nuclear weapons programme.’
Trump is threatening to scrap the international agreement unless tough new restrictions were placed on Iran before 12 May.
He cited disagreements on the issue as a reason for his decision to fire on 13 March his Diplomatic Chief Rex Tillerson and replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who is considered hawkish.
The president is concerned that parts of the deal start to expire from 2026 and that it fails to address Iran’s missile programme, its regional activities or its human rights abuses.
A US exit could kill the nuclear pact, which the Islamic republic has refused to re-negotiate.
Struck in 2015, it was signed by Iran with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Germany.
Under the agreement, Iran agreed to freeze its nuclear programme in return for the lifting of punishing international sanctions.
While Iran has reaped massive economic benefits from the accord, notably by being able to resume oil exports, it is still constrained by US sanctions in other areas.
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO's eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.
-
Agile, sovereign, edge-ready: rewiring defence IT for a contested decade
Today's rapidly changing security landscape means that armed forces can no longer treat their data in the same way as in the past. What are the key challenges they face, and how can industry help them?
-
US lawmakers prepare a historic investment in stockpile replenishment in FY2027
The House Armed Services Committee recently released the Chairman’s NDAA FY2027 markup, which supports the Pentagon’s request for nearly $90 billion for long-range missiles, air defence interceptors, precision-guided munitions and industrial baseline items.