Pentagon still backs Iran nuclear deal, says official
The Iranian nuclear deal is still in the best interests of the US, a senior Pentagon official said 13 March, going against President Donald Trump's claim that it is a ‘terrible’ agreement.
US Central Command Chief General Joseph Votel told a Senate panel he shared the views of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joe Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Votel said: ‘From my perspective, the JCPOA addresses one of the principal threats that we deal with from Iran.
‘So, if the JCPOA goes away, then we will have to have another way to deal with the nuclear weapons programme.’
Trump is threatening to scrap the international agreement unless tough new restrictions were placed on Iran before 12 May.
He cited disagreements on the issue as a reason for his decision to fire on 13 March his Diplomatic Chief Rex Tillerson and replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who is considered hawkish.
The president is concerned that parts of the deal start to expire from 2026 and that it fails to address Iran's missile programme, its regional activities or its human rights abuses.
A US exit could kill the nuclear pact, which the Islamic republic has refused to re-negotiate.
Struck in 2015, it was signed by Iran with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Germany.
Under the agreement, Iran agreed to freeze its nuclear programme in return for the lifting of punishing international sanctions.
While Iran has reaped massive economic benefits from the accord, notably by being able to resume oil exports, it is still constrained by US sanctions in other areas.
You may also like
More from Defence Notes
-
![US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness]()
US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness
The US Congress has raised concerns about how inflation rates and cuts in main acquisition programmes could affect the US military.
-
![Can the US overcome Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities?]()
Can the US overcome Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities?
Washington’s ageing inventory and the pace Moscow and Beijing have been modernising their capabilities put in check the US Nuclear deterrence.
-
![US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap]()
US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap
The Pentagon has been operating under temporary funding since October 2023, which has impacted its main acquisition and development programmes, increasing the capability gap between the US and China.
-
![NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls]()
NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls
In 2023, defence spending increased by an unprecedented 11% across European NATO countries and Canada. Since 2014, the group has spent an additional US$600 billion on defence.
-
![US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025]()
US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025
The DoD requested nearly US$850 billion to fund operations over the next fiscal year. Despite the amount being 1% higher than the FY2024 budget request, it has not covered the 3% inflation rate, which could impact the DoD’s main programmes in the medium and long term.
