Pentagon denies US wants 'cost + 50%' from allies for bases
Acting Pentagon chief Patrick Shanahan denied reports on 14 March 2019 that the US has a 'cost-plus-50%' formula for allies to pay for the US military presence on their soil.
Earlier this week, Bloomberg reported that President Donald Trump is pushing the formula as a basis for Germany, Japan and other allies to compensate Washington for US troops based in their countries. But Shanahan told the Senate Armed Services Committee that such reports were 'erroneous.'
'We won't do cost-plus-50%,' he said in a hearing. He said US partners should pay their 'fair share' when they can, but there was no such business-like formula. 'We're not going to run a business and we're not going to run a charity,' Shanahan said. 'Payment comes in lots of different forms. At the end of the day, people need to carry their fair share,' he said. 'Not everyone can contribute. It is not about cost-plus-50%.' Shanahan did not say whether Trump, who built a multibillion-dollar fortune in the real estate business, himself has advocated the formula.
Since coming into office, Trump has warned US allies, especially in NATO and East Asia, to pay more for the US presence. The White House has said that means NATO allies need to be spending 2% of their gross domestic product on defence.
More from Defence Notes
-
Turning the Hiroshima Accord into Action: Enhancing UK-Japan Defence Collaboration (Studio)
The UK-Japan strategic partnership leverages joint defence initiatives, advanced technologies, and SME integration to enhance military capabilities, foster innovation, and ensure regional and global stability through collective action and effective project management.
-
NATO countries outline strategies to accelerate defence industrial production
During the Washington Summit, member states also agreed to improve manufacturing capacities across the alliance and continue investing in joint projects with Ukraine.
-
Why the US military needs an “innovation intervention”
Several issues in the Pentagon’s structure and the defence industrial base have been hampering the country's efforts to produce cutting-edge solutions.