NATO agrees response to new Russia missile
NATO on 26th June agreed a package of political and military measures to boost its defences against a controversial new Russian missile system.
The alliance will review its air and missile defences, along with its intelligence and surveillance programmes, unless Moscow abandons its 9M729 ground-launched cruise missiles by 2nd August.
The US and NATO say Russia is breaching the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty with the missile and endangering peace in Europe.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Russia still had a chance to save the landmark Cold War arms control pact.
‘There’s a window of opportunity. Time is running out but it is still possible for Russia to save the INF treaty,’ Stoltenberg told reporters at a meeting of NATO defence ministers. ‘If they don’t come back into compliance before 2nd August then they have to bear the full responsibility for the demise of the treaty.’
After years of complaining to Russia about the missile, the US announced in February it would pull out of the INF on 2nd August unless Moscow gave it up.
A meeting of the NATO-Russia Council has been called next week as a last-ditch attempt to save the deal, but there is little expectation of Russia backing down.
Moscow for its part insists the missile complies with the INF and has made counter-accusations against the US.
A number of European allies are keen to use every last moment to try to save the INF, which is seen as a cornerstone of global arms control, but defence ministers agreed to prepare measures in case the efforts fail.
‘We have agreed on a wide range of measures: political measures, military measures, exercises, missile defence, conventional and any others,’ Stoltenberg said. ‘Some of them will be long term, others it will be possible to implement short term or more concretely.’
Because it is launched from mobile batteries, NATO says the missile is hard to detect and it can hit capital cities across Europe with nuclear warheads in a matter of minutes, lowering the threshold for conflict.
Stoltenberg said there was no sign of Russia giving up the 9M279 - on the contrary, he accused Moscow of continuing to deploy it.
Earlier this year the 29 NATO countries publicly backed Washington’s assessment that the nuclear-capable missile violates the INF, which banned ground launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 km (300 to 3,400 miles).
More from Defence Notes
-
“Engage with the operational problem”: how software innovation can boost UK defence
In Conversation… Shephard’s Andrew White talks to Zafer Şen, CEO and co-founder of OBSS, about the future of command-and-control software in the age of artificial intelligence, and his company’s ambitions in the UK defence market.
-
“Capital follows confidence” as defence courts private money
Outside investment and the direction in which venture money flows may reveal what defence will buy years before formal programmes begin.
-
Canada’s new military drone marketplace targets rapid acquisition pipeline
The Department of National Defence expects initial contracts to deliver thousands of uncrewed systems, but has yet to establish the quantities, capability mix or deadline behind Ottawa’s promised tenfold expansion.
-
Ukraine turns legacy Kongsberg land turrets into semi-autonomous USV weapons
The company told Shephard that Ukraine is operating modified Protector weapon stations originally supplied for armoured vehicles, with human operators authorising engagements from hundreds of kilometres away.
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.
-
Thales: deployment speed to determine winners in ‘production versus production’ era
At its technology summit in London, attended by Shephard, Thales UK examined the importance of speed to delivery, the growing focus on cross-domain capabilities and how procurement reform could be crucial for future battlefield advantage.