Defying US, Paris and Berlin stand firm on EU defence pact
Europe must be able to stand on its own feet militarily, France and Germany said 16 January as they made the case for a new EU defence pact that has rattled Washington.
In opening remarks at the Munich Security Conference, French Defence Minister Florence Parly and her German counterpart Ursula von der Leyen said the EU plan posed no threat to NATO.
But they stressed that the European Union needed the 'autonomy' to respond to security threats, even while bolstering their commitments to the NATO alliance.
'When we are threatened in our own neighbourhood, particularly to the south, we have to be able to respond, even when the United States or the [NATO] alliance would like to be less implicated,' Parly said.
Von der Leyen also took a swipe at Washington for cutting its aid and diplomacy budgets, reminding 'our American friends' that they have 'precious commitments beyond military means'.
The EU announced in December a permanent structured cooperation on defence agreement, known as PESCO, aimed at developing new military equipment and improving cooperation and decision-making.
Senior US officials voiced doubts about the EU plan this week, fearing it could draw resources away from NATO or become a 'protectionist' umbrella for European defence manufacturers.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has cautiously welcomed the EU's efforts to step up its defence initiatives, but warned that these must not undermine the transatlantic alliance or duplicate its work.
Batting away those concerns, Parly said 'those who try to say it's either the EU or NATO: it's a false debate'.
But EU nations must be ready to act 'without asking the United States to come to our aid, without asking them to divert their ISR capabilities or their supply craft from other missions,' she added.
Von der Leyen agreed that building up Europe's military autonomy was compatible with shoring up the NATO alliance.
'It is about a Europe that can also add more weight militarily so that it can be more autonomous and carry more responsibility - also within NATO,' she said.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.