China rejects US accusations it seeks hegemony in Asia
China on 31 May rejected accusations from top US officials that it seeks hegemony in Asia and is pushing militarisation in the South China Sea.
Outgoing US Navy Admiral Harry Harris, set to become Washington’s ambassador in South Korea, had said on 30 May that while North Korea posed the most imminent threat to the US, China’s ‘dream of hegemony in Asia’ was his country’s biggest long-term challenge.
The comments were not surprising, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a regular press briefing on 31 May, given that ‘those who seek and indulge in hegemony will always think that others are coveting their own hegemony. But no matter how developed China may become, it will never seek hegemony or engage in expansion.’
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis had vowed on 29 May that the US would keep confronting China over its territorial claims in the South China Sea – where Beijing has established a significant military presence on contested islands.
US diplomats and foreign nations alike were ‘very concerned about this continued militarisation’ in the region, he told reporters.
But Hua termed Mattis’ comments ‘rather ridiculous.’
She said: ‘China was not the first country to deploy weapons in the South China Sea, nor is it the country with the most weapons there, and neither is it the country with the most frequent military activities there.
‘As for exactly who is pushing militarisation, everyone can drop the scales from their eyes to see that the answer is self-evident.’
Mattis in February 2018 unveiled the US National Defense Strategy which made clear Washington will focus on Asia in the context of China’s growing military might.
Meanwhile, Chinese Ministry of Defence spokesman Ren Guoqiang told a regular press briefing in Beijing on 31 May that the country’s sole operational aircraft carrier – the ‘Liaoning’ – has reached initial combat readiness.
The carrier group has conducted multiple exercises which have ‘effectively tested (its) comprehensive attack and defence system’ and prepared it for combat operations on the open seas, he said.
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: Partnership deals surge as industry prepares for defence spending growth
Dozens of partnership agreements, joint ventures and industrial cooperation arrangements were announced at Eurosatory 2026, highlighting how defence companies are expanding production capacity, localising manufacturing and accelerating capability development in anticipation of rising defence spending.
-
Eurosatory 2026: New public security needs drive personal protection equipment modernisation
European law enforcement and public security agencies are entering a new cycle of investment in personal protection equipment (PPE), driven by evolving threat profiles, officer welfare requirements and advances in materials technology.
-
The speed of relevance: how companies can navigate the new era of European defence procurement
European militaries face a rapidly evolving security landscape and defence production must accelerate to meet surging demand for platforms and equipment. Industry needs to adapt to ensure it gets its products into the hands of the end user, Evelyn Rafferty, Senior Director Aerospace and Defence - Europe at Plexus told Shephard’s Gerrard Cowan.
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO’s eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Eurosatory 2026 to highlight changing defence and security priorities
Eurosatory 2026 will reflect a defence and security sector shaped by conflict, rising government spending, uncrewed systems, multidomain networks and growing demand for sovereign capabilities.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.