Should the US be concerned about the state of its nuclear arsenal?
A test of an unarmed Minuteman III at Vandenberg Air Force Base. (Photo: US Air Force)
The Pentagon has been struggling to ensure the readiness of its nuclear capabilities, according to a former commander of US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM). Long-lasting issues involving budget, bureaucracy, complexity of the systems and low levels of flexibility of an ageing arsenal have been playing a relevant role in putting the US in what Gen (ret.) C. Robert Kehler, former commander of USSTRATCOM, considers an alarming situation.
Designed and built in the Cold War era, Washington’s systems have been in service for more than five decades. Although they have passed through life extension, these platforms feature an old architecture that hampers efforts to
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Air Warfare
-
Extending mission readiness: where XR adds real value in pilot, crew and maintenance training
Extended reality (XR) is becoming increasingly relevant in military aviation training, adding a flexible layer to an integrated ecosystem spanning the pilot, crew, and maintenance domains.
-
US military tests AI-powered CUAS turret against drone swarms
As the US continues to invest heavily in counter-drone systems, demand for low-cost, mobile and autonomous technologies is on the rise, with Edda designed to align with these emerging requirements.
-
August crewed air review: KC-390 momentum builds as demand in the tanker market grows
The KC-390 is building a growing international operator base, but competition in the transport and tanker market is increasingly likely to depend on interoperability, commonality and the strength of supporting ecosystems. Meanwhile, Boeing’s KC-46 and Airbus’s A330 also gained ground in August.
-
Iran war exposes the limits of US military mass
As the Straits of Hormuz continue to witness military action of various types, what does this mean for combat air and air defence planners in the region and beyond?