Russia opposes US plan for more NATO ships in Black Sea
A US proposal to send more NATO ships to the Black Sea to ensure safe passage for Ukrainian vessels and deter Russia is viewed ‘negatively’ in Moscow, the Kremlin said 3 April 2019.
Washington has been working on a package to boost surveillance and send more NATO ships to the Black Sea after a naval confrontation between Moscow and Kiev last year, the US ambassador to NATO said. The measure was expected to be discussed during talks by NATO foreign ministers in Washington on 4 and 5 April.
Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the Kremlin viewed such a proposal ‘negatively’. ‘We do not understand what they mean by this. The situation with the Kerch Straight and navigation there is well known,’ he told reporters.
Russian deputy foreign minister Alexander Grushko told Russian news agencies the plan would only lead to ‘increased military risks’ in the region. ‘If additional military and technical measures are needed from our side, we will adopt them,’ Interfax news agency quoted Grushko as saying.
Most alliance members share concerns about Russia which backs separatists in a smouldering conflict in eastern Ukraine that has so far claimed some 13,000 lives.
In November, Russia fired on and seized three Ukrainian navy vessels, capturing two dozen sailors near the Kerch Strait, as they tried to pass from the Black Sea to the Azov Sea. It was the first open military clash between Kiev and Moscow since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and a pro-Russian insurgency erupted in eastern Ukraine.
‘We are going to make sure that we have the capability to deter a very aggressive Russia,’ US ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchison told reporters on Tuesday. She said the US package was designed ‘to assure that there is a safe passage for Ukrainian vessels through the Kerch Strait.’
Observers say that an increased NATO presence in the region is one of Russia's worst nightmares. Putin has openly said that Moscow's decision to take over Crimea was partly motivated by NATO's expansion into Eastern Europe.
Peskov did not say Wednesday whether Russia would in fact allow NATO ships to pass through the Azov Sea. ‘A decision will be made when there is such a request,’ the Kremlin spokesman said.
The West has accused Moscow of illegally blocking access to the Sea of Azov, used by both Russia and Ukraine.
More from Naval Warfare
-
Hanwha wins Australian government approval to increase its stake in Austal
The contract would mean the two shipbuilders can collaborate strategically and enhance shipbuilding capabilities in Western Australia.
-
Royal Australian Navy sizes up modernisation plans for new and existing capabilities
The Australian navy is pushing ahead with its efforts to modernise its workforce and capabilities while balancing risky submarine upgrades, ageing Collins-class boats and a shrinking minehunter fleet. Head of navy capability RAdm Stephen Hughes updated Shephard on the force’s progress.
-
UK to join US Navy’s Virginia-class submarine assembly effort to speed up construction
The expansion of the Virginia-class submarine construction to UK shores could accelerate the project as US shipbuilders continue to fall short of delivery goals.
-
US Navy seeks new sensors for the CH-53K King Stallion heavy-lift helicopter
The US Navy intends to publish a draft request for proposals in Q2 2026 and conduct an open competition for the supply of new electro-optical and infrared capabilities for the CH-53K heavy-lift helicopter.
-
What new technologies could be involved in UK Atlantic Bastion initiative?
As new details emerge on the UK Royal Navy’s plan to secure the North Atlantic for the UK and NATO, three main areas of opportunity for new technology are the focal point.
-
NATO naval exercises map out future USV requirements but raise questions on acquisition
Uncrewed surface vessels have shifted from a desirable capability to a critical one for navies. But should these systems be bought outright, rented as a service or rapidly built using commercial off-the-shelf components?