Create a free starter account, or log in.

Get access to four free articles per month, as well as our Decisive Edge Newsletters and Daily News Bulletin.

Email Address

Password

Forgot your password? Reset by clicking here

Create a Password

[[ req.met ? '✓' : '•' ]] [[ req.text ]]

Re-enter Password

Passwords do not match

First Name

Last Name

Country

Confirm your account

Please enter the four-digit pin below that has been emailed to you.

Didn't receive the pin yet?

This pin expires in 20 minutes.

[[ error ]]

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Stay informed with Shephard's award-winning journalism. Unlock unlimited access and in-depth analysis with a corporate or individual subscription.

Explore your options here

Questions arise with dysfunctional BMD-4 family

26th January 2021 - 19:00 GMT | by Alex Orlov in Moscow

RSS

There are a number of reasons for doubting whether the BMD-4 is still a good fit for Russian airborne troops.

Equipping the Russian Airborne Forces (VDV) with weapon systems based on the BMD-4 chassis appears to remain a high priority for the Russian MoD in view of announcements in recent months — but there are grounds for believing that this strategy is flawed.

Defence conglomerate Rostec announced in late November 2020 that acceptance trials have been completed for the 2S42 Lotos self-propelled artillery system. Shortly afterwards, in early December, Russian media reported that the MoD has decided to procure the 2S25 Sprut-SDM1 light tank.

Another system, the BMD-4 based Ptivelov (‘Bird Catcher’) self-propelled anti-aircraft gun, is under development and expected

Already have an account? Log in