Lasers are coming, but are personnel protected?
The US Army’s recent tests of high-energy laser systems, including on the Stryker combat vehicle, illustrates a potential problem with their use; the safety of personnel exposed to them.
Though counter-UAS tests have been reportedly effective, demonstrations have been limited by the need to ensure all engagements are below-the-horizon so as not to risk blinding nearby aircraft.
Coming with such limitations is uneven recognition that effective training with – and fighting against – tactical laser systems will require protecting the eyes of those in contact with them.
'As more laser threats emerge, we’re being asked to design eyewear
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Land Warfare
-
Development of Serbia’s upgraded Pasars-16 air defence system completed but in limbo
The standard Pasars mobile air defence system has been in service with the Serbian Army for several years and was developed by the Serbian Military Technical Institute.
-
Getting the most from open-architecture solutions in defence
What are the best practices for maximising the benefits of open-architecture technology for military applications?
-
Rheinmetall signs $521 million agreement for ammunition as it plans factory in Latvia
Rheinmetall has been increasing its production capacity since 2022 and aims to be able to produce up to 1.5 million 155mm artillery shells annually by 2027.
-
Engineering and design mean smaller vehicles can be tank killers but is it a good idea?
The eulogy for the dedicated tank hunter or buster appears to have been written with most armies putting them out to retirement in the face of alternatives like longer-range missiles or uncrewed aerial systems (UAS). However, arming infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) or armoured personnel carriers (APCs) with medium-range missiles seems to indicate some kind of tank killer is required.
-
Light tanks for Slovakia – cost-effective alternative or false economy?
Slovakia is currently considering replacing its Soviet era main battle tanks (MBTs) with lighter alternatives. However, the lower cost of these platforms may prove to be a false economy if they cannot compete with true MBTs.
-
How can multiple domains act as one?
How can we sense, make sense, and act faster than the adversary?