US Army seeks 'fundamental transformation' to face future threats
Long-Range Precision Fires will remain a priority for the US Army. (Photo: US Army)
By applying lessons learned from the Ukraine war and reviewing doctrine and procurement priorities, the US has outlined what the future army will look like. The need to field a more lethal, mobile, modular force will require multi-billion investments in the coming years.
The service will emphasise development and deployment of solutions, equipment and technologies to improve its autonomy, connectivity, firepower and sustainability capacities.
‘The army is really undergoing its most fundamental transformation in 40 years. We are moving away from the system that we designed in the 80s to a bunch of new systems’, Secretary of the US
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
Forging strong partnerships for warfighting communications in space (Studio)
Mike Moran, Director of US Government Business at Amazon Project Kuiper Government Solutions, highlighted the evolution of space as a critical warfighting domain at the Defence in Space Conference (DISC) 2025, held this week in London.
-
Details revealed on Germany’s big spending plans
In May this year, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the government plans to position Germany as “Europe's strongest conventional army”. A new blueprint outlines how this is going to occur through massive investment.
-
European Council to deliver at “pace and scale” on European defence readiness 2030 roadmap
Two of the concrete projects outlined in the readiness report, the European Air Shield and Space Shield, will aim to be launched by Q2 2026.
-
Malaysia’s defence budget sets out major procurement goals for 2026
The country has allocated RM21.70 billion for defence spending next year, with some major procurements set to be initiated across the country’s army, navy and air force.
-
GAO highlights the need for more commercial data and availability improvements
The US Government Accountability Office recently released two reports; one into the availability of selected equipment and another looking at how the government gets data and intellectual property rights through contracting.