Violence halts UN aid convoys from Jordan to Syria's Daraa
The UN said on 28 June that it had halted cross-border convoys carrying desperately needed aid from Jordan to southern Syria over security concerns amid a barrage of air strikes on rebel-held towns.
Jan Egeland, the head of the UN's Syria humanitarian taskforce, told reporters in Geneva: ‘The extremely effective lifeline across the border from Jordan has been discontinued due to the fighting in recent days.’
He said no aid convoys had crossed the border in the past two days.
His comments came amid a barrage of Russian strikes on rebel-held towns in southern Syria, killing 22 civilians on 28 June alone, making it the bloodiest day yet of the government's offensive in the strategic region.
With Moscow's help, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's army has battered the south for more than a week with air strikes, rocket fire and crude barrel bombs.
The UN has warned that more than 750,000 lives are at risk in the south, which is meant to be protected by a ceasefire put in place in 2017 by Russia, Jordan, and the US.
But now, President Bashar al-Assad has set his sights on retaking the area.
‘Tens of thousands of civilians are fleeing for their lives,’ Egeland said, describing the situation as ‘heart wrenching, because this was a zone were people felt safe until just ten days ago.’
He urged Russia, Jordan and the US to re-establish the de-escalation agreement they hammered out for the area last July, insisting ‘they can do it again.’
Egeland said: ‘There is nothing inevitable about this escalation of fighting.’
The bombardment has already forced more than 50,000 to flee their homes in search of safety, according to the UN, while others huddle in their basements to wait out the raids.
Egeland said the fighting was ‘so intense’ that the UN had failed to ‘reach sufficient agreements on safe passage for the convoys.’
He called on ‘all who have influence on the situation,’ including Russia, the US and Jordan, ‘to do their utmost to ensure that we get that kind of assurance, and then the convoys will resume.’
The onslaught has sparked fears of a re-run of the offensives in 2017 against the rebel enclaves of Aleppo and eastern Ghouta, including deadly bombardments followed by a retaking of territory and an accord to evacuate rebels from the areas.
While most civilians on the move are fleeing towards Jordan, Amman has said it intends to keep the border closed, insisting it is unable to host the new wave of refugees.
The small country of around nine million people is already estimated to have taken in close to 1.3 million fleeing Syrians, and to have spent more than $10 billion hosting them.
Egeland acknowledged on 28 June that Jordan had been more than generous, and said he felt hesitant to ask more of the country, especially at a time when European countries ‘have a pathetic quarrel’ over taking in much lower numbers of migrants and refugees.
But he appealed to Jordan to ‘keep its border open for people fleeing.’
He added: ‘There is no other place to go.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.