US wasted billions in failed Afghan stabilisation efforts: official
The US wasted billions of dollars trying to stabilise fragile parts of Afghanistan from 2001-2017 and some efforts caused more harm than good, a US government watchdog said on 24 May.
A report by the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) found that Washington had set unrealistic expectations for itself after the US-led invasion in 2001 and overestimated its ability to build and reform government institutions.
Special Inspector General John Sopko said as he presented the report in Washington: ‘Despite some heroic efforts to stabilise insecure and contested areas in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2017, the programme mostly failed.
‘This happened for a number of reasons, including the establishment of a set of unrealistic expectations about what could be achieved in just a few years’ time.’
The report found that the military pressured aid groups to build schools and infrastructure in areas that were still being contested by the Taliban, leading to the failure of many projects.
The document states: ‘Opportunities for corruption and elite capture abounded, making many of those projects far more harmful than helpful.’
The SIGAR analysis found that Washington had set expectations and programmes not properly tailored for Afghanistan, and noted that successes in stabilising Afghan districts rarely lasted longer than the physical presence of coalition troops and civilians.
SIGAR noted: ‘Under immense pressure to quickly stabilise insecure districts, US government agencies spent far too much money, far too quickly, in a country woefully unprepared to absorb it.’
More from Defence Notes
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.
-
Thales: deployment speed to determine winners in ‘production versus production’ era
At its technology summit in London, attended by Shephard, Thales UK examined the importance of speed to delivery, the growing focus on cross-domain capabilities and how procurement reform could be crucial for future battlefield advantage.
-
Orchestrating operational readiness across every defence domain
Are all systems ready for the next mission? Have upgrades been applied? Are all assets aligned to deploy together, on time and fully prepared? In modern defence operations, readiness is no longer measured platform by platform. It is measured by how well people, assets, data and decisions move together — across land, sea and air.