US denies report it is leaving up to 1,000 troops in Syria
The US strongly denied a report that it intended to leave almost 1,000 troops in Syria, adding plans for a residual force of around 200 troops had not changed.
The Wall Street Journal had reported on 17 March that as talks with Turkey, US-backed Kurdish forces and European allies have failed to produce a deal on a ‘safe zone’ in north-eastern Syria, the US now intended to keep working with Kurdish fighters in the country.
It quoted US officials as saying the plan could see up to 1,000 US forces spread across the country.
‘A claim reported this evening by a major U.S. newspaper that the US military is developing plans to keep nearly 1,000 U.S. troops in Syria is factually incorrect,’ General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a statement. ‘There has been no change to the plan announced in February and we continue to implement the President's direction to draw down U.S. forces to a residual presence.’
But he added the US was continuing to ‘conduct detailed military planning with the Turkish General Staff to address Turkish security concerns along the Turkey-Syria border.’
‘Planning to date has been productive and we have an initial concept that will be refined in the coming days,’ he said. ‘We are also conducting planning with other members of the Coalition who have indicated an intent to support the transition phase of operations into Syria.’
President Donald Trump had abruptly announced in December 2018 the immediate and complete withdrawal of the 2,000 US troops deployed in north-eastern Syria, declaring victory against the Islamic State group. The decision prompted his defence secretary Jim Mattis to quit.
Then, under pressure from Congress and the Pentagon, he agreed to leave a residual force of some 200 US troops, which he wants to be reinforced by allies in the anti-IS coalition.
An objective of the international force is to guarantee the security of its Syrian Kurd allies. Turkey, a NATO member, views the Kurdish combatants as terrorists, and the Europeans fear they would be vulnerable if Ankara launched an offensive.
More from Defence Notes
-
US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness
The US Congress has raised concerns about how inflation rates and cuts in main acquisition programmes could affect the US military.
-
Can the US overcome Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities?
Washington’s ageing inventory and the pace Moscow and Beijing have been modernising their capabilities put in check the US Nuclear deterrence.
-
US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap
The Pentagon has been operating under temporary funding since October 2023, which has impacted its main acquisition and development programmes, increasing the capability gap between the US and China.
-
NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls
In 2023, defence spending increased by an unprecedented 11% across European NATO countries and Canada. Since 2014, the group has spent an additional US$600 billion on defence.
-
US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025
The DoD requested nearly US$850 billion to fund operations over the next fiscal year. Despite the amount being 1% higher than the FY2024 budget request, it has not covered the 3% inflation rate, which could impact the DoD’s main programmes in the medium and long term.