US defense chief woos Brazil as Chinese influence grows
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis praised Brazil's clout and urged closer strategic ties Tuesday in what appeared to be part of a concerted push back against growing Chinese influence in Latin America.
Mattis, who is starting a tour of the region, told military officers at Rio's war college that Brazil and the United States had interests built on shared geography, democracy and battlefield history dating to World War II.
Mattis said the United States wants a 'stronger relationship', with a focus on using the Brazil's Alcantara space centre, whose location near the equator makes launches more effective.
China is developing its space infrastructure in Latin America, with a base in southern Argentina's Patagonia region. It has also pushed deep into the continent's economies as an investor and major client for agricultural, mineral and other commodities.
Mattis said that US interest in Alcantara was 'not because it lies along the equator, a happy accident of geography, but because we want to work with Brazilians -- our hemispheric neighbours whose values we share politically, as well as your technological orientation.'
'Others cannot credibly say the same,' he said in what appeared to be a pointed reference to China.
China's regional rise comes after long decades of deep, sometimes controversial US influence in Latin America. Mattis made clear that Washington is in no mood to give way.
'We see Latin America as our neighbour. Some people say we don't pay much attention to it. That is certainly not the case in the military,' Mattis said in separate comments issued by the Pentagon's press office.
He told officers in Rio that following an April discussion with Brazil's defence minister, Joaquim Silva e Luna, he ordered staff 'to transform our defence relationship with Brazil, to reenergise it.'
Mattis singled out Brazil as a regional leader, praising the country's record of multiple peacekeeping missions and its stand against the deeply anti-US government in chaotic Venezuela.
Mattis described the Venezuelan leadership as a 'power-hungry, oppressive regime that forces refugees into Brazil and into Colombia, and elsewhere.'
The Brazilian defence minister said Monday after talks with Mattis that his US counterpart believed 'the solution (in Venezuela) should be led by Brazil.'
In an interview with Brazil's O Globo newspaper earlier this week, Mattis again emphasised what he said were the shared democratic values in the US-Latin American partnerships, specifically comparing this to the nature of the new regional rivals China and Russia.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.