South Korea court offers conscientious objectors options
South Korea’s Constitutional Court on 28 June upheld the jailing of those who evade the country’s military conscription law, but ordered authorities to provide conscientious objectors with an alternative form of national service.
Almost 65 years after the end of the Korean War, nearly every able-bodied South Korean man between the ages of 18 and 35 must still complete around two years of military service.
Anyone refusing the call-up usually ends up in prison for 18 months, and with no alternative community service option some 19,000 conscientious objectors have been jailed since 1950, most of them Jehovah’s Witnesses.
In a split decision, the court’s nine judges upheld a provision in the current conscription law under which draft dodgers can be punished with up to three years in prison.
The court said in its decision: ‘It is legitimate to enforce military duty through criminal punishment.’
But it ruled that another phrase in the conscription law that does not recognise any alternative to military service is in breach of the constitution.
In a statement, the defence ministry said that it had been considering alternatives to military service, and ‘will decide on a policy at the earliest possible date in line with the Court decision.’
South Korea’s armed forces rely heavily on conscription and military service often involves postings to front-line positions on the border with North Korea.
In May 2010, a North Korean submarine torpedoed the South Korean naval vessel Cheonan, killing 46 sailors including 16 who were on military service.
In November 2010, the North shelled a South Korean border island, killing two marines – both of them young conscripts.
But tensions with Pyongyang have drastically eased in 2018, with the North scaling back confrontation over its nuclear arsenal and holding summits with the South and the US, and calls for alternative forms of service have been on the rise.
In several previous cases the country’s top courts have backed conscription, but 28 June’s verdict followed appeals from 28 objectors against the law, who cited the freedom of conscience guaranteed in the constitution.
Some 200 objectors are currently serving prison terms and 883 others have cases pending at various levels in the legal system – a number which has grown rapidly in recent months as judges delayed decisions, waiting for the Constitutional Court to rule.
More from Defence Notes
-
The speed of relevance: how companies can navigate the new era of European defence procurement
European militaries face a rapidly evolving security landscape and defence production must accelerate to meet surging demand for platforms and equipment. Industry needs to adapt to ensure it gets its products into the hands of the end user, Evelyn Rafferty, Senior Director Aerospace and Defence - Europe at Plexus told Shephard’s Gerrard Cowan.
-
Eurosatory 2026 to highlight changing defence and security priorities
Eurosatory 2026 will reflect a defence and security sector shaped by conflict, rising government spending, uncrewed systems, multidomain networks and growing demand for sovereign capabilities.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.
-
Agile, sovereign, edge-ready: rewiring defence IT for a contested decade
Today's rapidly changing security landscape means that armed forces can no longer treat their data in the same way as in the past. What are the key challenges they face, and how can industry help them?