Questions hover over Five Eyes (Opinion)
The Five Eyes partnership worked well for years but strains are beginning to show. (Photo: Australian Institute of International Affairs)
Since the end of the Second World War, the Five Eyes alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US has been the bedrock of Western intelligence sharing.
This partnership exists to provide a wide range of intelligence collection on targets around the world, enhancing the ability of partner nations to react to crises.
Although the grouping benefits primarily from the economies of scale that come from being intelligence partners with the US, which has a vast intelligence collection capability outmatching all the others combined, this is not a one-way street. Each nation offers something, including the provision
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Defence Notes
-
“Engage with the operational problem”: how software innovation can boost UK defence
In Conversation… Shephard’s Andrew White talks to Zafer Şen, CEO and co-founder of OBSS, about the future of command-and-control software in the age of artificial intelligence, and his company’s ambitions in the UK defence market.
-
“Capital follows confidence” as defence courts private money
Outside investment and the direction in which venture money flows may reveal what defence will buy years before formal programmes begin.
-
Canada’s new military drone marketplace targets rapid acquisition pipeline
The Department of National Defence expects initial contracts to deliver thousands of uncrewed systems, but has yet to establish the quantities, capability mix or deadline behind Ottawa’s promised tenfold expansion.
-
Ukraine turns legacy Kongsberg land turrets into semi-autonomous USV weapons
The company told Shephard that Ukraine is operating modified Protector weapon stations originally supplied for armoured vehicles, with human operators authorising engagements from hundreds of kilometres away.
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.