Questions hover over Five Eyes (Opinion)
The Five Eyes partnership worked well for years but strains are beginning to show. (Photo: Australian Institute of International Affairs)
Since the end of the Second World War, the Five Eyes alliance between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US has been the bedrock of Western intelligence sharing.
This partnership exists to provide a wide range of intelligence collection on targets around the world, enhancing the ability of partner nations to react to crises.
Although the grouping benefits primarily from the economies of scale that come from being intelligence partners with the US, which has a vast intelligence collection capability outmatching all the others combined, this is not a one-way street. Each nation offers something, including the provision
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
UK releases security strategy and plans for future defence spending boost
The UK’s National Security Strategy brings together the recently released Strategic Defence Review (SDR), Strategic Security Review, AUKUS Review and Industrial and Trade Strategies. At the same time, the UK made a commitment to reach defence spending of 5% of GDP by 2035 and Germany committed to 3.5% by 2029.
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.