Not seeking Cold War with Russia, says NATO chief
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on 16 March that the alliance did not want a return to Cold War hostilities with Russia while expressing support for Britain's strong stance on the nerve agent attack.
He said the targeting of former double agent Sergei Skripal fit a ‘pattern of reckless behaviour’ to which the US-led military alliance had responded, but insisted political dialogue must also continue.
Stoltenberg told BBC radio: ‘We do not want a new Cold War, we do not want a new arms race, Russia is our neighbour therefore we have to continue to strive for an improved better relationship with Russia.’
He noted that NATO allies have in recent years imposed economic sanctions on Russia and deployed more troops in eastern Europe in response to the ‘changed security situation’.
But he stressed: ‘To isolate Russia is not an alternative.’
He added: ‘At some point Russia will understand that it is in its interests not to confront us but to cooperate with us, and we are ready to do so if they respect some basic norms and rules for international behaviour.’
NATO has backed Britain following the 4 March attack in the southwestern English city of Salisbury, which left Skripal and his daughter Yulia in a critical condition.
Stoltenberg said: ‘We have no reason to doubt the findings and assessments made by the British government, not least because this takes place at the backdrop of a pattern of reckless behaviour by Russia over many years.’
British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson on 16 March stressed the government's ‘quarrel’ was with Russian President Vladimir Putin rather than the Russian people.
Johnson, during a museum visit in west London alongside his Polish counterpart Jacek Czaputowicz, said: ‘Our quarrel is with Putin's Kremlin, and with his decision, and we think it overwhelmingly likely that it was his decision to direct the use of a nerve agent on the streets of the UK, on the streets of Europe, for the first time since the Second World War. That is why we are at odds with Russia.’
Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn, who has questioned whether the Russian state was responsible for the attack, warned on 16 March against a ‘drift to conflict’.
Writing in The Guardian, the Labour leader said ‘a connection to Russian mafia-like groups that have been allowed to gain a toehold in Britain cannot be excluded.’
He said: ‘To rush way ahead of the evidence being gathered by the police, in a fevered parliamentary atmosphere, serves neither justice nor our national security.’
Corbyn's leftwing views have in the past drawn criticism of many of his own MPs, and several among them have defied him to back the Conservative government's position.
By 16 March morning, 33 Labour MPs had signed a parliamentary motion blaming the Russian state ‘unequivocally’.
Corbyn wrote that Labour was ‘no supporter of the Putin regime’, but added: ‘That does not mean we should resign ourselves to a 'new Cold War' of escalating arms spending, proxy conflicts across the globe and a McCarthyite intolerance of dissent.’
More from Defence Notes
-
US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness
The US Congress has raised concerns about how inflation rates and cuts in main acquisition programmes could affect the US military.
-
Can the US overcome Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities?
Washington’s ageing inventory and the pace Moscow and Beijing have been modernising their capabilities put in check the US Nuclear deterrence.
-
US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap
The Pentagon has been operating under temporary funding since October 2023, which has impacted its main acquisition and development programmes, increasing the capability gap between the US and China.
-
NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls
In 2023, defence spending increased by an unprecedented 11% across European NATO countries and Canada. Since 2014, the group has spent an additional US$600 billion on defence.
-
US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025
The DoD requested nearly US$850 billion to fund operations over the next fiscal year. Despite the amount being 1% higher than the FY2024 budget request, it has not covered the 3% inflation rate, which could impact the DoD’s main programmes in the medium and long term.