NATO chief says spy attack must have 'consequences'
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on 15 March backed a ‘proportionate’ British response to a nerve agent attack on a former Russian spy, saying the incident must have ‘consequences’.
Stoltenberg said the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter, which he called the first offensive use of a nerve agent on the alliance's territory since its foundation, came against the ‘backdrop of a pattern of reckless behaviour’ by Russia.
He said he would hold special talks with British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson in Brussels on 19 March over the attack in the city of Salisbury, but added that Britain had not invoked the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause.
British Prime Minister Theresa May ordered the expulsion of 23 Russian diplomats and suspended some high-level contacts with the Kremlin after saying Moscow was ‘culpable’ for the attempted murder of Skripal.
Stoltenberg said: ‘Britain is not alone. I am absolutely certain that the UK will respond and is responding in a proportionate and measured way. But at the same time, I fully support that there is a need for a response, because it has to have consequences when we see actions like we have seen in Salisbury.’
The former Norwegian Premier said NATO itself was not taking any direct steps beyond offering political support, although it would offer ‘practical support’ with the investigation if Britain wanted.
He said NATO was already responding strongly to years of Russian aggression including the annexation of Crimea, the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and meddling in western elections.
Stoltenberg added: ‘The attack in Salisbury has taken place against a backdrop of reckless behaviour by Russia over many years.’
Stoltenberg said Britain had not asked for the triggering of NATO's fundamental collective defence clause – which the US used after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
He said: ‘There has been no request for article 5 and it is for nations to ask for that.’
More from Defence Notes
-
US lawmakers warn that “more military spending is absolutely necessary” to ensure Pentagon’s readiness
The US Congress has raised concerns about how inflation rates and cuts in main acquisition programmes could affect the US military.
-
Can the US overcome Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities?
Washington’s ageing inventory and the pace Moscow and Beijing have been modernising their capabilities put in check the US Nuclear deterrence.
-
US FY2024 funding package passes as China closes military capability gap
The Pentagon has been operating under temporary funding since October 2023, which has impacted its main acquisition and development programmes, increasing the capability gap between the US and China.
-
NATO outlines future challenges as Ukrainian funding from US stalls
In 2023, defence spending increased by an unprecedented 11% across European NATO countries and Canada. Since 2014, the group has spent an additional US$600 billion on defence.
-
US Pentagon to reduce investments in main acquisition programmes over FY2025
The DoD requested nearly US$850 billion to fund operations over the next fiscal year. Despite the amount being 1% higher than the FY2024 budget request, it has not covered the 3% inflation rate, which could impact the DoD’s main programmes in the medium and long term.