France's Macron says NATO experiencing 'brain death'
French President Emmanuel Macron said he believed NATO was undergoing ‘brain death,’ lamenting a lack of coordination between Europe and the United States and unilateral action in Syria by key member Turkey, in an interview published on 7 November.
‘What we are currently experiencing is the brain death of NATO,’ Macron told The Economist magazine.
The president's explosive comments, appearing to question the very future of NATO, threatened to send shock waves through the alliance ahead of a summit in Britain next month.
‘You have no coordination whatsoever of strategic decision-making between the United States and its NATO allies. None,’ said Macron.
‘You have an uncoordinated aggressive action by another NATO ally, Turkey, in an area where our interests are at stake,’ he added, according to an English transcript released by The Economist.
Turkey's latest military operation against Kurdish forces in northern Syria was staunchly opposed by fellow members like France, but made possible by a withdrawal of US forces ordered by President Donald Trump.
‘There has been no NATO planning, nor any coordination,’ Macron said.
And while NATO works well in communicating between armies and commanding operations, ‘strategically and politically, we need to recognise that we have a problem,’ he said.
‘We should reassess the reality of what NATO is in light of the commitment of the United States,’ he warned, adding that ‘In my opinion, Europe has the capacity to defend itself.’
Macron said that while ‘it's not in our interest’ to expel Turkey from NATO – as has been urged by some politicians – members states should ‘reconsider what NATO is.’
And he emphasised it was crucial to seek a rapprochement with Moscow, which regards NATO and its expansion into ex-Communist bloc states with huge suspicion since the alliance was set up to counter the USSR.
‘We need to reopen a strategic dialogue, without being naive and which will take time, with Russia,’ said Macron, who is seeking to broker an end to the conflict in Ukraine and has courted President Vladimir Putin as a partner.
He said NATO did not reexamine its future in the early 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union and ‘the unarticulated assumption is that the enemy is still Russia.’
‘So, the question about the present purpose of NATO is a real question that needs to be asked’, especially by the United States where Trump sees the alliance as a ‘commercial project’, he said.
And Macron said he believed that Putin, for all the anti-Western bombast from the Kremlin, would find his strategic options limited, in the long term, to ‘a partnership project with Europe.’
‘If we want to build peace in Europe, to rebuild European strategic autonomy, we need to reconsider our position with Russia,’ said Macron.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.