France, Germany 'jumping the gun' on EU army: Dutch PM
France and Germany are jumping the gun with calls for a European army, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said 16 November, asserting that the continent's safety could be guaranteed only through NATO.
‘The idea of a European army is going way too far for the Netherlands,’ Rutte said at his weekly post-cabinet press conference.
‘France and Germany are really jumping the gun. As far as the Netherlands is concerned, NATO remains the cornerstone of our defence policy,’ he told journalists.
French President Emmanuel Macron sparked controversy last week with his proposal for a ‘European army’ to ‘protect ourselves with respect to China, Russia and even the United States’.
He said he wanted to reduce Europe's dependence on the US and US weapons for its own security.
Macron's call reflected a desire among several European countries to more autonomously handle their own collective defence, after US President Donald Trump's criticised Europe for what he sees as inadequate contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation defence alliance.
Trump called Macron's idea ‘very insulting’, tweeting that Europe should ‘first pay its fair share of NATO, which the US subsidises greatly’.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has seconded Macron's proposal.
During a European parliament session, she emphasised the need for Europe to bolster its self-defence capabilities, and said that a European army could run parallel to NATO.
‘Europe must take our fate into our own hands if we want to protect our community,’ she said.
But Rutte insisted NATO remained the primary guardian of Europe's safety.
‘As far as I am concerned, it is an illusion to think that the European Union without NATO can guarantee her safety,’ Rutte said.
‘NATO, and the United States within the organisation, remains a crucial partner for peace and security in Europe and we will continue to point that out to our partners in our discussions,’ he said.
More from Defence Notes
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.