Airbus to axe 3,700 jobs in Europe
Airbus is to axe around 3,700 jobs in Europe as it cuts back production of its troubled A380 superjumbo and A400M military transporter, the company and union officials announced on 7 March.
The cuts come as Airbus downscales deliveries of the under-selling A380 – the world’s biggest passenger jet – to six a year from 2020 and eight a year for the similarly problematic A400M.
The company said ‘up to 3,700 jobs’ in France, Germany, Britain and Spain would be affected by the drop in production, without saying whether the posts were being cut or moved elsewhere.
But Force Ouvriere, the biggest union representing Airbus staff, said after a meeting with company executives that Airbus was planning to shed 3,720 jobs while avoiding outright redundancies.
After the meeting at Airbus headquarters in the southwestern French city of Toulouse, union leader Jean-Marc Escourrou said: ‘At no moment was there any discussion of outright layoffs.’
Temporary jobs and subcontractors will be the first to go, he added.
The jobs lost will include 1,900 in Germany, 850 in Spain and 470 in France.
Britain will lose 450 jobs at the Filton factory in Bristol which builds wings for the A400M, said FO official, Yvonnick Dreno.
Dreno said: ‘The falling rate for the A400M will affect them 100%.’
Airbus said in a statement that it was ‘committed to managing any implications for its workforce in a responsible manner.’
It added: ‘The company is confident that it will be able to propose opportunities to most of the affected employees through programmes which are being ramped up.’
Airbus had in January warned it would have to halt production of the A380 altogether unless it received new orders.
Emirates Airlines, already the biggest customer for the A380 with 101 in its fleet and 41 more on order, threw it a lifeline days later by striking a $16-billion deal to buy 36 more of the jets.
Airbus decided in 2007 to pursue the A380, capable of packing in 853 seats – a move diametrically opposed to rival Boeing’s bet on the Dreamliner, marketed as a more efficient plane that could be used for both medium and long-distance flights.
But the economics of the four-engine A380 have proved daunting, with airlines having to operate every flight at full capacity in order to make a profit.
The A400M programme has also been fraught with worries, including delivery delays and technical problems.
Airbus nevertheless said in February that record deliveries, windfall gains from divestments and favourable exchange rates had boosted profits in 2017, even though it took a $1.6-billion hit from problems with the A400M.
The A400M is one of the most ambitious joint defence programmes ever launched in Europe. Seven countries are involved: Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Spain and Turkey.
Related Equipment in Defence Insight
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: New public security needs drive personal protection equipment modernisation
European law enforcement and public security agencies are entering a new cycle of investment in personal protection equipment (PPE), driven by evolving threat profiles, officer welfare requirements and advances in materials technology.
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO’s eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Eurosatory 2026 to highlight changing defence and security priorities
Eurosatory 2026 will reflect a defence and security sector shaped by conflict, rising government spending, uncrewed systems, multidomain networks and growing demand for sovereign capabilities.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.