What lessons could Europe learn from air power use in Ukraine?
The use of small drones has opened up new possibilities for cost-effective strike but such systems have range and payload limitations. (Photo: Ukraine MoD)
It’s fair to say that June’s remote first-person view (FPV) drone strike on four Russian airfields was totally unexpected. The targeting of bombers that had been a key part of standoff actions against Ukrainian cities was surprising in just about every regard.
The long-term planning to load heavy trucks with uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and position these thousands of kilometres inside Russia, astonished everyone. The intelligence work to ensure the targets were there would have been a major achievement. Moreover, the mission required multi-mode control systems, involving relatively un-jammable fibre-optic cable, radio and some autonomy so that the probability of
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Air Warfare
-
US plans to raise defence production by 300% but multiple uncertainties remain
The strategy, schedule and budget to support Washington’s intention to speed up the manufacturing of defence capabilities remain unclear.
-
Switzerland faces procurement shake-up with reduced F-35 buy and five-year Patriot delays
The reduction in the number of planned F-35A aircraft from 36 to 30 by the Swiss government comes due to budget constraints, with no firm plans to fill the gap despite “negative consequences”.
-
What will the replacement of A-10s by F-35s mean for the US Air Force?
The USAF plans to phase out its 162 in-operation A-10 Thunderbolt II Warthogs by the end of FY2026, replacing them with F-35As which will bring a leap in capabilities in terms of lethality, survivability and speed.