South Korea considers cancellation of second AH-64E Apache helicopter purchase
South Korean already operate 36 AH-64E Apache helicopters. (Photo: US Air Force / Sgt. Cody Nelson)
South Korea is considering scrapping its 36 AH-64E Apache helicopter buy, after a major cut in defence budget and shift in the country’s defence priorities towards uncrewed aerial systems (UAS).
The National Assembly approved the cuts which saw budget for the programme reduced from KRW10 billion (US$7.3 million) to KRW300 million.
The plans originally sought to acquire 36 helicopters by 2028 at a cost of KRW 3.3 trillion (US$2.49 billion) – the second phase in the country’s attack helicopter acquisition programme. The country already operates 36 AH-64E Apache helicopters, which finished delivery in 2017.
The AH-64 rotorcraft were chosen to
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Air Warfare
-
Sikorsky unveils new Nomad VTOL drone family
The tailsitting vertical take-off and landing drones are designed to be scalable with Group 3 to Group 4 variants, with each one focused on meeting US Army reconnaissance requirements.
-
MQ-28A Ghost Bat: Australia’s drone charts the future of loyal wingman UAVs
Boeing Australia’s MQ-28A Ghost Bat stands as the oldest “loyal wingman” currently in development, with potential European opportunity on the horizon for the uncrewed aerial vehicle.
-
US Air Force DASH 2 experiment compares AI and human judgement for battle accuracy and speed
The trials aimed to discover how AI can help operators make faster and sharper decisions in challenging battlespaces.
-
AFA 2025: CUAS solutions demonstrate modularity and portability focus
Aerovironment, Epirus and SNC displayed their counter-uncrewed aerial systems, with both non-kinetic and kinetic options for military services.
-
Should the Ukrainian model for UAS technology development be copied?
The country’s industrial defence transformation since 2022 has ramped up rapidly, offering Europe and NATO lessons in agility, innovation and rapid procurement. But how easily can, or should, such wartime innovation be copied?