USS Gerald R Ford propulsion mods completed
The US Navy and Huntington Ingalls Industries-Newport News Shipbuilding (HII-NNS) have completed the maintenance and repair of the propulsion plant for the USS Gerald R Ford nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.
Completed on 22 July, this follows some 12 months of work to the powerplant of CVN 78, the lead example in this class of carrier, and the modification has now been accepted by the USN, marking progress in the vessel’s post-shakedown availability (PSA).
‘For the past year or so, the focus has been supporting the shipyard in propulsion plant production work,’ said Cdr Emily Bassett, from Edmonds, Washington, the ship’s reactor officer.
‘With hard work, innovation, and teamwork, reactor department sailors and their shipyard counterparts together have achieved a major milestone. We now enter the transition phase, where our focus shifts from a shipyard production work mindset to a ship’s force operational and maintenance mindset.’
During Ford’s PSA, sailors worked alongside HII-NNS shipyard technicians to complete 400,000 hours of maintenance and production work to reach this milestone, but Ford sailors are still working to get the ship ready to join the rest of the fleet and return to sea to complete additional aircraft carrier qualifications.
Problems with the propulsion system were first noted while conducting trials at sea in January 2018, when the crew identified a component in the propulsion train that was operating outside of design specifications.
In May 2018, three days into planned testing and evaluation, the ship experienced another propulsion plant issue associated with a design modification which resulted in Ford returning to homeport. Once in Norfolk, adjustments were made and the ship returned to sea later that month.
Ford returned to port on 7 June 2018, following the successful completion of all required ship testing during its at sea period. During these tests, the USN and Newport News Shipbuilding determined the required steps to correct the manufacturing problems that would be fully corrected during Ford’s PSA.
Ford’s propulsion issues were not with the nuclear reactors themselves, but the mechanical components associated in turning steam created by the nuclear plant into spinning screws that propel the ship through the water, the USN says.
Related Equipment in Defence Insight
More from Naval Warfare
-
Canada’s selection of TKMS for its new patrol submarines reflects rising Arctic competition
The decision points to deepening NATO cooperation and mounting competition in the Arctic and North Atlantic, as Canada opts for a European-designed solution despite interest from South Korea.
-
US Navy’s MUSV programme could lay the USV procurement blueprint for NATO allies
The programme’s structure as a marketplace will allow multiple companies to compete for ongoing procurements; an approach which could be replicated across the Atlantic.
-
UK Royal Navy shifts focus from warships to system-led warfare
With a revised Defence Investment Plan on the way ahead of the upcoming NATO Summit on 7-8 July, the UK government has begun to reveal more details of how its future naval fleet could look.
-
Funding for the future US Navy Trump-class battleship sparks controversy in Congress
Lawmakers question the US Navy’s proposed $2 billion investment in the Trump-class battleship as concerns over cost, technology maturity and operational relevance fuel growing bipartisan scrutiny on Capitol Hill.