New EU ‘peace fund’ could buy weapons
The EU wants to pay for military equipment, including lethal weaponry, for partner countries in crisis zones such as Africa’s Sahel region as part of a $12.4 billion ‘peace facility’ launched on 13 June.
The bloc says the new European Peace Facility (EPF) is needed to make its training missions in three African countries more effective and to enable it to contribute to peacekeeping efforts elsewhere in the world.
But the EU paying for arms is a sensitive issue for some member states, especially when it involves countries with histories of political unrest and human rights abuses, and there could be resistance to the proposal.
The new EPF is being kept separate from the main EU budget to get around the bloc’s rules against funding military projects.
The EU’s diplomatic chief Federica Mogherini said the EPF – which needs approval by all of the bloc’s member countries – would make it easier to help stabilise restive countries like Mali, Somalia and the Central African Republic.
Mogherini said: ‘The world is living in difficult times and this calls for a European Union responsibility and role on the global scene. Both Europeans and our partners in the world expect the EU to be more and more a security provider in our region and beyond.’
The proposal, made by the European Commission, the bloc’s powerful executive arm, would see partner countries given ‘comprehensive support’, which officials said could include weapons.
Decisions about what to spend EPF money on would be taken by member states themselves, through the European Council.
An EU official told AFP that any decision to pay for weapons would take into account the bloc’s human rights values and only in ‘very specific cases and after careful checking.’
Arms would only be provided as part of a package alongside training, and would not be the main focus of the EPF funding, the official said.
The fund hopes to improve the effectiveness of the EU’s training missions in Africa.
The official pointed to the Somalia operation, where in some cases local forces have been unable to apply the training they have received because of a lack of equipment as basic as proper boots.
More from Land Warfare
-
![Do heavy IFV designs make sense on the modern battlefield?]()
Do heavy IFV designs make sense on the modern battlefield?
Even with additional armour, many current-generation infantry fighting vehicles are highly vulnerable to enemy fire in the contemporary operating environment. Are heavier platforms based on tank designs for use in this role the answer?
-
![Uncrewed ground vehicles put to the test as NATO eyes autonomous shift]()
Uncrewed ground vehicles put to the test as NATO eyes autonomous shift
The European Land Robot Trials are influenced by NATO researchers seeking to create uncrewed ground vehicle standards for allied Western forces working in multinational task forces.
-
![More details revealed on Kosovo’s Humvee Hawkeye 105mm order]()
More details revealed on Kosovo’s Humvee Hawkeye 105mm order
The agreement points to growing international interest in mobile and survivable artillery systems, with further orders and export opportunities already emerging.
-
![UK Defence Investment Plan: What does it mean for the British Army?]()
UK Defence Investment Plan: What does it mean for the British Army?
The UK’s Defence Investment Plan splurges big for future air and naval programmes, including new hybrid ships, but there are fewer big-ticket items for British Army vehicles. Shephard’s Damian Kemp looks at the much delayed plan.
-
![DroneShield signs agreements and US contract in the face of surging demand]()
DroneShield signs agreements and US contract in the face of surging demand
DroneShield has been at the forefront of CUAS capability despite being founded only 12 years ago. The company’s early move into the counter-drone arena has put it on the crest of the rapidly expanding technology field.
