US withdrawal from Syria to be done in 'prudent' way: Trump
President Donald Trump on Monday sought to end fears of an abrupt US pull-out from Syria, saying the fight against the Islamic State group is not over and that withdrawal would be done in a ‘prudent’ manner.
‘We will be leaving at a proper pace while at the same time continuing to fight ISIS and doing all else that is prudent and necessary!’ Trump tweeted.
The president has come under withering pressure both at home and in allied capitals after previous statements indicating that he considered the IS group vanquished and that he wanted US troops out of Syria imminently.
Trump's new statement follows a trip by his national security adviser John Bolton to Israel in which he told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday that withdrawal would not happen before ‘ISIS is defeated and not able to revive itself.’
In a call, Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron spoke of ‘the commitment of the United States and France to the destruction of ISIS as well as plans for a strong, deliberate, and coordinated withdrawal of US troops from Syria,’ the White House said.
‘They reiterated that any further use of chemical weapons in Syria must not be tolerated.’
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said he had spoken with French officials.
‘We'll make sure we address the concerns that they have. Everyone understands what the United States is doing,’ he told reporters as he headed on a Middle East visit.
The reassurances followed a diplomatic storm caused by Trump's surprise announcement in December that appeared to signal a rapid withdrawal from Syria, where US special forces play an important role in supporting local forces fighting ISIS.
‘We've won against ISIS,’ he said at the time. ‘We've beaten them and we've beaten them badly. We've taken back the land. And now it's time for our troops to come back home.’
Allies like Britain and France warned that ISIS was not defeated. Questions were also raised over the fate of Kurdish groups that have done much of the fighting alongside the United States in Syria, but now fear attacks from Turkey.
The initial pull-out promise also sparked outspoken opposition from within Trump's Republican party and the resignation of respected defence secretary James Mattis.
In Monday's statement, Trump complained that media coverage had skewed his original words, saying that his latest position on Syria was ‘no different from my original statements.’
Currently, about 2,000 US forces are in the Syria, which is in the grips of a complex civil war. Most of the US soldiers are there to train local forces fighting the hardcore-Islamist ISIS.
‘We will continue to work with the coalition and regional partners toward an enduring defeat of ISIS,’ Commander Sean Robertson, a Pentagon spokesman, told AFP.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.