US seeks to regain lost ground against China on rare earths
Rare earths are used in major US defence production programmes such as the F-35. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)
The DoD announced on 22 February that it has awarded MP Materials a $35 million contract to design and build a US facility to process heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) for defence and commercial applications.
The facility will be the first processing and separation facility of its kind for HREEs in the US, as the DoD seeks to ensure security of supply for essential materials used in defence equipment production.
Rare earths comprise 17 metals that can be processed for use in permanent magnets for motors, catalytic converters, batteries and electronics.
Major US defence programmes such as the F-35 fighter rely in part on a steady supply of HREEs: speaking in July 2020, for example, Australian Defence Minister Linda Reynolds said that each aircraft includes 417kg of these rare earth metals.
Once a leader in HREE extraction and processing, the US has been overtaken by China in recent decades and there is only one rare earths mine in the country, leading to deep concerns in the Pentagon.
In 2018, the Trump administration identified the rare earths minerals sector as a risk area due to dependency on foreign sources, and the US Senate is now considering a bill (the Restoring Essential Energy and Security Holdings Onshore for Rare Earths Act of 2022) that would set up a domestic supply chain and require the DoD to source these minerals domestically.
The bill also blocks defence contractors from using rare earth elements mined in China after 2026.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.