US gives Russia 60 days to comply with nuclear treaty
The US warned Russia on 4 December it will withdraw from a major Cold War treaty limiting mid-range nuclear arms if Moscow does not dismantle missiles that Washington says breach it within 60 days.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Washington would no longer be bound by the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty unless Moscow withdraws a new system that has threatened to trigger an arms race.
NATO said it was now ‘up to Russia’ to save the deal, seen by many as an important part of the global arms control architecture, and alliance chief Jens Stoltenberg said it was time to prepare for its demise.
‘The United States today declares Russia in material breach of the treaty and we will suspend our obligations as a remedy in 60 days unless Russia returns to full and verifiable compliance,’ Pompeo said after talks with fellow NATO foreign ministers.
‘Russia's actions gravely undermine American national security and that of our allies and partners. It makes no sense for the United States to remain in a treaty that constrains our ability to respond to Russia's violations.’
The US and NATO say Russia's 9M729 system, also known by the designation SSC-8, violates the INF treaty, which banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres.
The nuclear-capable Russian cruise missiles are mobile and hard to detect and can hit cities in Europe with little or no warning, according to NATO, dramatically changing the security calculus on the continent.
Stoltenberg said that although Russia has a last chance to comply, ‘we must also start to prepare for a world without the treaty’, which was the first to abolish a whole category of weapons.
‘This was really arms control at its best and therefore it's a really a big setback if this treaty now breaks totally down,’ he said.
‘I regret that we will now most likely see the end of the INF treaty, but at the same time we don't have any other alternative than to react in the way we do.’
In October, President Donald Trump declared the United States would pull out of the treaty and build up America's nuclear stockpile ‘until people come to their senses’.
But on 3 December, the US leader said he wants talks with his Chinese and Russian counterparts Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin ‘to head off a major and uncontrollable Arms Race’.
The INF was a bilateral treaty between the US and the then Soviet Union, so it puts no restrictions on other major military actors like China.
Pompeo said there was no reason why the US ‘should continue to cede this crucial military advantage’ to rival powers.
If Russia does not comply within the 60-day deadline, the US will begin the six-month process of formally withdrawing from the INF treaty.
Until then, Pompeo said, the US would not ‘test or produce or deploy any systems’ that would breach the treaty.
The US won strong backing for its position from the rest of the NATO allies, who said in a joint statement that it was ‘now up to Russia to preserve the INF treaty’.
More from Defence Notes
-
Why small guns have been critical to layered CUAS architectures
Multiple countries have been deploying small arms as the last line of drone defence due to their multiple operational and tactical advantages.
-
Singapore Airshow 2026: ST Engineering hints at export success for AME assault rifle family
The Singapore-based technology company unveiled its new rifle family at this week’s airshow. Chen Chuanren spoke with the ST Engineering’s head of small arms to find out more about how the weapons have been refined.
-
High tension in the High North – a wake-up call for NATO’s future Arctic defence efforts?
Any potential ‘Arctic Sentry’ mission would be months in the planning, but with tensions high in the region given the US’s push for Greenland, NATO countries will need to continue to emphasise their commitment to the region, analysts have said.
-
Venezuela prepares personnel and equipment for a potential second US attack
Defence Minister Gen Vladimir Padrino López has declared that the Venezuelan armed forces “will continue to employ all its available capabilities for military defence”.
-
As the new year starts, the UK defence spending delay continues
The UK’s defence spending commitments remain uncertain as the government’s Defence Investment Plan, which had been due by the end of 2025, is yet to be published.