US gives Russia 60 days to comply with nuclear treaty
The US warned Russia on 4 December it will withdraw from a major Cold War treaty limiting mid-range nuclear arms if Moscow does not dismantle missiles that Washington says breach it within 60 days.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Washington would no longer be bound by the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty unless Moscow withdraws a new system that has threatened to trigger an arms race.
NATO said it was now ‘up to Russia’ to save the deal, seen by many as an important part of the global arms control architecture, and alliance chief Jens Stoltenberg said it was time to prepare for its demise.
‘The United States today declares Russia in material breach of the treaty and we will suspend our obligations as a remedy in 60 days unless Russia returns to full and verifiable compliance,’ Pompeo said after talks with fellow NATO foreign ministers.
‘Russia's actions gravely undermine American national security and that of our allies and partners. It makes no sense for the United States to remain in a treaty that constrains our ability to respond to Russia's violations.’
The US and NATO say Russia's 9M729 system, also known by the designation SSC-8, violates the INF treaty, which banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres.
The nuclear-capable Russian cruise missiles are mobile and hard to detect and can hit cities in Europe with little or no warning, according to NATO, dramatically changing the security calculus on the continent.
Stoltenberg said that although Russia has a last chance to comply, ‘we must also start to prepare for a world without the treaty’, which was the first to abolish a whole category of weapons.
‘This was really arms control at its best and therefore it's a really a big setback if this treaty now breaks totally down,’ he said.
‘I regret that we will now most likely see the end of the INF treaty, but at the same time we don't have any other alternative than to react in the way we do.’
In October, President Donald Trump declared the United States would pull out of the treaty and build up America's nuclear stockpile ‘until people come to their senses’.
But on 3 December, the US leader said he wants talks with his Chinese and Russian counterparts Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin ‘to head off a major and uncontrollable Arms Race’.
The INF was a bilateral treaty between the US and the then Soviet Union, so it puts no restrictions on other major military actors like China.
Pompeo said there was no reason why the US ‘should continue to cede this crucial military advantage’ to rival powers.
If Russia does not comply within the 60-day deadline, the US will begin the six-month process of formally withdrawing from the INF treaty.
Until then, Pompeo said, the US would not ‘test or produce or deploy any systems’ that would breach the treaty.
The US won strong backing for its position from the rest of the NATO allies, who said in a joint statement that it was ‘now up to Russia to preserve the INF treaty’.
More from Defence Notes
-
Estonia opts for smart, adaptable and cooperative solutions in the face of Russian threat
Estonian-made equipment is being put through the toughest of evaluations in the hands of Ukrainian soldiers resisting the full-scale Russian invasion which began in 2022. The country has long seen the threat and is continuing to adapt for the future.
-
Estonia boosting defence industry with lessons from Ukraine, says country’s economic minister
Estonia is looking to boost its local defence industry with directed funding, industry parks, support through international orders for equipment and rapid prototyping.
-
UK faces cost of balancing defensive capabilities abroad as Iran conflict widens
The UK has recently deployed a Type 45 destroyer to Cyprus and has bolstered its presence in the Middle East in recent weeks with supporting air power to protect neighbouring countries’ air defences.
-
White House calls on Pentagon contractors to “rapidly and aggressively” boost weapon production
Intended to sustain Operation Epic Fury against Iran, efforts to increase the production of weapons and ammunition could expose long-standing weaknesses in the US defence industrial base.
-
India’s strategic defence footprint expansion could be accelerated by Iran-Israel conflict
The latest escalation between Iran and Israel could shape New Delhi’s next-generation shield as India deepens cooperation with Israel on missile defence and drone production.
-
Is the US magazine of air defence interceptors deep enough to sustain a long campaign against Iran?
The Pentagon spent a considerable number of THAAD and SM-3 rounds to defend against Iranian missiles in 2025 and has not fully replenished its reserves.