US gives Russia 60 days to comply with nuclear treaty
The US warned Russia on 4 December it will withdraw from a major Cold War treaty limiting mid-range nuclear arms if Moscow does not dismantle missiles that Washington says breach it within 60 days.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Washington would no longer be bound by the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty unless Moscow withdraws a new system that has threatened to trigger an arms race.
NATO said it was now ‘up to Russia’ to save the deal, seen by many as an important part of the global arms control architecture, and alliance chief Jens Stoltenberg said it was time to prepare for its demise.
‘The United States today declares Russia in material breach of the treaty and we will suspend our obligations as a remedy in 60 days unless Russia returns to full and verifiable compliance,’ Pompeo said after talks with fellow NATO foreign ministers.
‘Russia's actions gravely undermine American national security and that of our allies and partners. It makes no sense for the United States to remain in a treaty that constrains our ability to respond to Russia's violations.’
The US and NATO say Russia's 9M729 system, also known by the designation SSC-8, violates the INF treaty, which banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres.
The nuclear-capable Russian cruise missiles are mobile and hard to detect and can hit cities in Europe with little or no warning, according to NATO, dramatically changing the security calculus on the continent.
Stoltenberg said that although Russia has a last chance to comply, ‘we must also start to prepare for a world without the treaty’, which was the first to abolish a whole category of weapons.
‘This was really arms control at its best and therefore it's a really a big setback if this treaty now breaks totally down,’ he said.
‘I regret that we will now most likely see the end of the INF treaty, but at the same time we don't have any other alternative than to react in the way we do.’
In October, President Donald Trump declared the United States would pull out of the treaty and build up America's nuclear stockpile ‘until people come to their senses’.
But on 3 December, the US leader said he wants talks with his Chinese and Russian counterparts Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin ‘to head off a major and uncontrollable Arms Race’.
The INF was a bilateral treaty between the US and the then Soviet Union, so it puts no restrictions on other major military actors like China.
Pompeo said there was no reason why the US ‘should continue to cede this crucial military advantage’ to rival powers.
If Russia does not comply within the 60-day deadline, the US will begin the six-month process of formally withdrawing from the INF treaty.
Until then, Pompeo said, the US would not ‘test or produce or deploy any systems’ that would breach the treaty.
The US won strong backing for its position from the rest of the NATO allies, who said in a joint statement that it was ‘now up to Russia to preserve the INF treaty’.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.