Taiwan to conduct live-fire drill simulating China ‘invasion’
Taiwan will practice thwarting a Chinese ‘invasion’ in annual live fire drills in June, simulating surprise coastal assaults to reflect increased military threats from Beijing, officials said on 24 April.
China's growing military is increasingly flexing its muscles and held live-fire drills last week in the Taiwan Strait -- the narrow waterway separating the Chinese mainland from Taiwan -- following weeks of naval manoeuvres in the area.
Chinese officials said their drills were to safeguard Beijing's territorial sovereignty, a major priority for their President Xi Jinping.
Although Taiwan is a self-ruling democracy, it has never formally declared independence from the mainland and Beijing still sees it as a renegade province to be brought back into the fold, by force if necessary.
Cross-strait relations have steadily deteriorated since 2016, when Chinese President Tsai Ing-wen took office, largely because she refuses to accept that Taiwan is part of ‘one China’, and because Beijing is deeply suspicious of her traditionally pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party.
Taiwan's five-day drill, codenamed ‘Han Kuang’, which means ‘Han Glory’, will start from 4 June.
‘Simply put, the main goal of the drill is to make any Chinese communist military mission to invade Taiwan fail,’ defence ministry spokesman Chen Chung-chi said.
Chen Chung-ch added: ‘It simulates this year's situation and we are taking into consideration China's air and naval movements in the region.’
According to Chen, the 2018 drill will enlist the coastguard and National Airborne Service Corps, which handles rescue flights, for the first time for ‘comprehensive defence.’
Civilian UAVs will also participate in the drill for the first time to conduct surveillance and mark targets, while civilian telecom service providers will assist in maintaining communication and control, the Chinese Defence Ministry said.
Chen continued: ‘It's not just soldiers' duties to protect the country. Everyone has the responsibility since our defence budget is limited.’
In the week ended 20 April, Taipei dismissed China's military exercises in the Taiwan Strait as ‘routine’ after expected large-scale naval manoeuvres failed to materialise and called it the "cheapest way of verbal intimidation and sabre-rattling.
Chinese media reported on 24 April that a flotilla of Chinese naval vessels held a ‘live combat drill’ in the East China Sea, the latest show of force in disputed waters that have riled neighbours.
In early April, Chinese President Xi Jinping inspected the convoy as it conducted exercises in the disputed South China Sea.
The flotilla then held two separate drills last week in waters on either side of Taiwan, infuriating the government in Taipei.
More from Defence Notes
-
UK releases security strategy and plans for future defence spending boost
The UK’s National Security Strategy brings together the recently released Strategic Defence Review (SDR), Strategic Security Review, AUKUS Review and Industrial and Trade Strategies. At the same time, the UK made a commitment to reach defence spending of 5% of GDP by 2035 and Germany committed to 3.5% by 2029.
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.