US DoD bets on non-standard procurement to improve readiness
The US DoD’s Other Transaction Authority (OTA) obligations increased by 712% between FY2015 and FY2019 according to a study by the think-tank Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS), released in October.
OTAs are legally binding instruments used by federal agencies to engage industry and academia for obtaining or advancing R&D work or prototypes. As they are not standard procurement contracts, they are generally not subject to the federal laws and regulations that non-traditional suppliers are unable to match.
The CSIS study analysed the topline contracting trends of the DoD that are available in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS).
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: New public security needs drive personal protection equipment modernisation
European law enforcement and public security agencies are entering a new cycle of investment in personal protection equipment (PPE), driven by evolving threat profiles, officer welfare requirements and advances in materials technology.
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO's eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.
-
Agile, sovereign, edge-ready: rewiring defence IT for a contested decade
Today's rapidly changing security landscape means that armed forces can no longer treat their data in the same way as in the past. What are the key challenges they face, and how can industry help them?