UK delays Integrated Review update pending spending review discussions
The UK MoD has pushed back on political efforts to clarify when the forthcoming Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy will be published.
Much to the frustration of both Conservative and Labour MPs, no specific timetable was given by Ben Wallace, Secretary of State for Defence, during a 2 November parliamentary oral questions session.
Instead, he said that the ‘implications’ of a one-year spending review – set to be completed on 25 November – are ‘currently being considered’.
The new spending review, led by the UK Treasury, will set 2021-2022 resource and capital budgets for individual government
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
How Canada plans to “seize” the opportunity to increase investments in defence
The Canadian Department of National Defence has been increasing efforts to accelerate the acquisition of new equipment and modernise its in-service inventory.
-
Palantir and Boeing partner up to bring AI to defence manufacturing
The partnership with the US airframer will see Palantir’s AI software leveraged to help streamline data analytics across Boeing’s 12 factories on defence and classified programmes.
-
DroneShield to double its US footprint to meet growing demand for counter-UxS capabilities
DroneShield disclosed to Shephard its plans to increase its workforce and manufacturing capacities while strengthening partnerships with US suppliers.
-
Singapore’s DSTA seeks wider partnerships to advance robotics and AI capabilities
The technology organisation is expecting a significant rise in the number of staff working across robotics and digital solutions as it becomes more of a focal point.
-
Modular and attritable equipment must be a priority: US military
Senior officers and representatives from the US Army, US Air Force and US Navy emphasised the need to expedite acquisition projects for systems and platforms that are more modular. They also highlighted that the loss of equipment is acceptable.