UK delays FCAS Outline Business Case submission
A key milestone for the UK's Future Combat Air System programme has not yet been met.
The UK MoD combat air acquisition programme team failed to submit its Future Combat Air System (FCAS) Outline Business Case (OBC) in line with an original target of the end of 2020.
Shephard understands that the OBC will now be sent to the MoD’s Investment Approvals Committee for acceptance before April 2021, with postponement necessary to align with Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) outcomes.
Approval of the OBC effectively triggers the start of a formal acquisition programme for the next-generation Tempest effort.
The OBC is expected to make explicit how the project will benefit the UK financially, add more international
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
![India’s strategic defence footprint expansion could be accelerated by Iran-Israel conflict]()
India’s strategic defence footprint expansion could be accelerated by Iran-Israel conflict
The latest escalation between Iran and Israel could shape New Delhi’s next-generation shield as India deepens cooperation with Israel on missile defence and drone production.
-
![Is the US magazine of air defence interceptors deep enough to sustain a long campaign against Iran?]()
Is the US magazine of air defence interceptors deep enough to sustain a long campaign against Iran?
The Pentagon spent a considerable number of THAAD and SM-3 rounds to defend against Iranian missiles in 2025 and has not fully replenished its reserves.
-
![New Zealand buys tri-service uncrewed kit from Syos Aerospace]()
New Zealand buys tri-service uncrewed kit from Syos Aerospace
As uncrewed technology continues to play an increasingly central role in modern military activities, New Zealand’s recent acquisitions point towards its the force’s focus on cost-effective capability.
-
![Golden Dome for America hits one-year mark but key questions remain on its progress]()
Golden Dome for America hits one-year mark but key questions remain on its progress
Integration issues, bureaucracy and undefined policies and authorities could hamper the full implementation of the “shield” to defend the US territory against aerial threats.
