Pompeo holds talks in 'tariff king' India
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 26th June, trying to chart a path that keeps the Asian ally onside politically even with the two countries at loggerheads over trade and a $5.2-billion Russian arms deal.
As a democratic heavyweight in a region dominated by authoritarian China, New Delhi is a natural bedfellow in Washington's effort to counter Beijing's rise and in 2016 the US designated India as a ‘major defence partner’.
But President Donald Trump's ‘America First’ mantra and his easy resort to tariffs - in what he says is a bid to bring jobs back to the US - has irked New Delhi.
Pompeo and Modi gave no news conference but the American was due to give a statement to media later on Wednesday.
The US-India relationship is particularly tricky because of New Delhi's own well-developed protectionism, often expressed through red tape that prevents foreign companies from competing in the huge market of more than a billion consumers, critics say.
Pompeo's talks with Modi Wednesday morning in New Delhi came ahead of the Indian prime minister's meeting with Trump at the G20 in Japan later this week, where import levies are expected to loom large.
Trump has in addition to slapping tariffs on $200 billion of Chinese imports and initiating trade battles with China, Japan, Mexico and the European Union also taken aim at India, calling the country the ‘tariff king’.
Last year Washington refused to exempt India from higher steel and aluminium tariffs.
Ties deteriorated this month when the US ended India's preferential trade status that allowed the Asian giant to send America $6 billion in goods duty-free every year.
India retaliated with tariffs on 28 items imported from the US, including almonds, apples and walnuts - products close to the hearts of voters in Trump's rural base.
Russian missiles
The US is also irked by what it sees as a growing thicket of Indian bureaucracy for US companies such as Walmart, which last year invested $16 billion in Flipkart in a major bet on the local e-commerce market.
Other points of contention include Indian price caps on medical equipment and its insistence that personal data held by firms like Mastercard be stored within India.
This has reportedly led to US threats to cap H-1B visas, popular among Indian IT professionals, although US officials have denied this.
Besides trade, a major bone of contention between the two countries is possible US sanctions over India's planned $5.2-billion purchase of the S-400 missile defence system from Russia.
Russia has long been a major arms supplier to India, but New Delhi's use of Moscow-made hardware complicates US efforts to bolster regional security cooperation to counter China, as well as its push to pressure the Kremlin.
Rising friction between the US and Iran have also affected India, with US waivers allowing New Delhi to buy Iranian oil having expired in May. India's economy is highly reliant on crude imports.
Eliot Engel, the Democrat who heads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said that recent US actions were at odds with Trump's promises that he would be a ‘true friend’ to India.
Washington needs to show a ‘predictable, coherent, and consistent strategy,’ Engel told Pompeo in a letter, and to counter a growing view that it is seeking to ‘coerce’ India.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.